2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a practicing surgeon detect early lymphedema reliably?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are generally accepted criteria but not well-established guidelines to diagnose lymphoedema using circumferential measurements, there are no universally applied methods to quantitatively define lymphoedema and no standard degree of enlargement or consensus, what constitutes lymphoedema, thereby complicating interpretation of the literature [17]. There are reports citing that a greater than 2 cm difference from baseline (preoperative) measurements identifies lymphoedema [18]. On the other hand girth measurements do not always correlate with symptoms or quality of life [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are generally accepted criteria but not well-established guidelines to diagnose lymphoedema using circumferential measurements, there are no universally applied methods to quantitatively define lymphoedema and no standard degree of enlargement or consensus, what constitutes lymphoedema, thereby complicating interpretation of the literature [17]. There are reports citing that a greater than 2 cm difference from baseline (preoperative) measurements identifies lymphoedema [18]. On the other hand girth measurements do not always correlate with symptoms or quality of life [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although volumetry has the aim of measuring irregular edemas like lymphedema 17 , perimetry, when performed carefully, supplements the evaluation as it shows the most affected sites, because the lymphedema is not homogeneous 18 . In this study, data from the perimetry enabled the mathematical calculation of the limb volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the sensitivity of this criterion is only 37%, the actual incidence may be much higher. [26] Therefore, reliable, easy-to-use, noninvasive, and cost-effective measurement methods are necessary. In addition, if the measurement method could provide information on the texture and shape of the affected arms, it would be more useful in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%