2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020je006521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a Combination of Convective and Magmatic Heat Transport in the Mantle Explain Io's Volcanic Pattern?

Abstract: Tidal dissipation makes Jupiter's moon Io the most volcanically active body in the Solar system. Most of the heat generated in the interior is lost through volcanic activity. In this study, we aim to answer the questions: Can convection and melt migration in the mantle explain the spatial characteristics of Io's observed volcanic pattern? And, if so, what constraints does this place on the viscosity and thickness of the convective layer? We examine three different spatial characteristics of Io's volcanic activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(225 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of the remaining ∼47 TW of Io's observed thermal emission-a truly vast amount of energy, equivalent to the Earth's total endogenic heat flow (47 ± 2 TW; Davies & Davies 2010)is unknown. It is likely that this thermal emission component originates from near-surface intrusive activity (Veeder et al 2012;Spencer et al 2020;Steinke et al 2020;Spencer et al 2021) or from shallow, recently buried volcanic deposits. It is also expected that the distribution and magnitude from these sources are a function of local volcanic activity, which, in turn, is a function of internal heating pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the remaining ∼47 TW of Io's observed thermal emission-a truly vast amount of energy, equivalent to the Earth's total endogenic heat flow (47 ± 2 TW; Davies & Davies 2010)is unknown. It is likely that this thermal emission component originates from near-surface intrusive activity (Veeder et al 2012;Spencer et al 2020;Steinke et al 2020;Spencer et al 2021) or from shallow, recently buried volcanic deposits. It is also expected that the distribution and magnitude from these sources are a function of local volcanic activity, which, in turn, is a function of internal heating pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed variation in surface heat flux δF O may be related to the originally produced heat flux δF P by some blurring function B ( l ) that depends on the spherical harmonic degree l (e.g., Steinke, Hu, et al., 2020; Steinke, van Sliedregt, et al., 2020). This assumes that there exists a convective layer beneath the lithosphere (typically the asesthenosphere) that produces its own heat tidally.…”
Section: Implications and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong retroaction between melt-induced tidal heating and melt production may lead to significant lateral variations in both melt content in the asthenosphere and crustal thickness, which may be amplified by bulk viscoelstic response. Convective transport may also strongly affect melt and heat transport (Tackley et al, 2001;Steinke et al, 2020b), making the surface expression of melt and heat production rather complicated (de Pater et al, 2021). Future modeling efforts are required to take into account lateral variations on tidal dissipation rate, including both shear and bulk dissipation and their consequences on melt and heat transport to the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%