Calorimetry of homologous p-n-alkoxybenzyliden-p'-hexyloxy-anilines

Fasone, Salvatore; Gandolfo, C.; Grasso, Domenico

doi:10.1016/0040-6031(86)85236-4

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…191 There is finally a last category of cases in which constitutional courts approach national measures of structural change with a view to correcting them. These are cases more in line with constitutional precedents developed in less turbulent times, 192 and in which constitutional courts struggle to maintain their original role of correcting national policy-making in the light of constitutional principles. 193 It is a line of judgments marked by four different features.…”

Section: On the Potential Of The Displaced: Deference Resistance Omentioning

confidence: 79%

National Constitutional Courts in supranational litigation: A contextual analysis

Dani¹

2017

European Law Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines the role of national constitutional courts in supranational litigation. It firstly illustrates their value and situates well‐known judicial doctrines affecting their jurisdiction in the context of the normative claims, policy agenda and institutional framework promoted by the European Union. Against this background, it gauges the potential of national constitutional courts in countering the process of intergovernmental and technocratic encroachment of national constitutional democracies characterising the most recent evolutionary stages of the European integration process. It is claimed that constitutional courts are in the position of reinforcing, resisting or correcting Union measures with a detrimental impact on national constitutional principles. After having identified in correction the approach more coherent with their constitutional mandate, the article highlights a disturbing paradox: in remaining faithful to their constitutional role, constitutional courts contribute to the sustainability of a comprehensive institutional setting corroding the idea of constitutional democracy on which they are premised.

show abstract

Section: On the Potential Of The Displaced: Deference Resistance Omentioning

confidence: 79%

National Constitutional Courts in supranational litigation: A contextual analysis

Dani¹

2017

European Law Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For instance, in 2012, Italy for the first time ever constitutionalised Parliament's rights of ex ante scrutiny and ex post oversight over public finances, which 'strike the interinstitutional balance very much in favour of Parliament' and put its budgetary information rights on a statutory footing. 144 In addition, the salience of EU matters in Italian parliamentary debates has risen because of the euro crisis and amounted to some 53% in the period 2006-2014. 145 The Spanish Organic Law on Budgetary Stability and Financial Sustainability of 2012 foresees that the government's stability objectives, cast in deficit and spending indicators, must be approved by both chambers of the Cortes Generales before the budgetary procedure can proceed.…”

Section: A Bottom-up Reinforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…152 For its part, the German Bundestag has become capable of substantially conditioning the development of domestic procedures related to EU economic governance. 153…”

Section: A Bottom-up Reinforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Crucially, the NPs' information rights have been fortified 'up to a point which had never been achieved so far'. 34 An empirical study suggests that in no less than 16 out of 27 NPs, more than 40% of all EU debates held in the period 2010-2012 addressed the euro crisis, while in 11 NPs, the percentage was 50% or higher. 35 This discursive element of the crisis is important, 36 because, as Curtin underlines, publicity and deliberation are 'truly distinctive qualities' of parliaments, especially in the EU context.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

National Parliaments and EU Fiscal Integration

Jančić

2016

European Law Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyses the impact of the euro crisis on national parliaments and examines their response to the deepening of EU fiscal integration and the correspondent limitation of their budgetary autonomy. It argues that the sovereign debt crisis has provoked the emergence of new channels of parliamentary involvement in EU economic governance. National parliaments have acquired various rights of approval in the European Semester, strengthened the accountability of national governments, reinforced their scrutiny over budgeting, improved their access to information, and created domestic and supranational avenues for deliberation and political contestation of European integration. In these respects, they have undergone further Europeanisation. While these reforms do not outweigh the centralisation of EU powers, they represent an embryonic step in the parliamentary adaptation to the nascent EU fiscal regime. Yet they are unlikely substantially to influence EMU policy-making processes, because of the democratic disconnect inherent in the EU's multilevel constitution.

show abstract