1984
DOI: 10.1016/0020-708x(84)90230-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calorimetric measurements of the half life of plutonium-240

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The half-life of 240 Pu has been reported as ''6552.471.7 years'' by calorimetry (Rudy et al, 1984), ''657476.2 years'' by mass spectrometry (Strohm, 1984), and ''6571717.5 years'' (Steinkruger et al, 1984) and ''6552.2713.8 years'' (Lucas andNoyce, 1984) by a-particle counting. The estimates suggest no systematic offset observed among different types of instruments, and demonstrate that calorimetry, as well as other methods, can provide very high-precision and high-accuracy measurements.…”
Section: Simplified Half-life Measurements Using 14 C Enriched Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The half-life of 240 Pu has been reported as ''6552.471.7 years'' by calorimetry (Rudy et al, 1984), ''657476.2 years'' by mass spectrometry (Strohm, 1984), and ''6571717.5 years'' (Steinkruger et al, 1984) and ''6552.2713.8 years'' (Lucas andNoyce, 1984) by a-particle counting. The estimates suggest no systematic offset observed among different types of instruments, and demonstrate that calorimetry, as well as other methods, can provide very high-precision and high-accuracy measurements.…”
Section: Simplified Half-life Measurements Using 14 C Enriched Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage of calorimetry is that a large amount of radioactive material may be directly measured without introducing errors resulting from diluting the original material to a lower radioactive level (sometimes by a factor of 10 8 ; Mann et al, 1961), which is required by the ionization counting system. The elegance of the calorimetry experimental design greatly reduces the introduction of systematic errors, and this is a prime reason why it is widely used for various applications (Rudy et al, 1984;Mann and Unterweger, 1995;Colle´and Zimmerman, 2001;Stump et al, 2005). While constant source, counting geometry, dead-time correction and discrimination levels have to be all considered within a gas counting system, the source of calorimetry can be enclosed in the glass or metal container and simply measured by its power output (Ramthun, 1973).…”
Section: Simplified Half-life Measurements Using 14 C Enriched Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%