2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of the Ångström–Prescott coefficients (a, b) under different time scales and their impacts in estimating global solar radiation in the Yellow River basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
1
18

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
46
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous study also found that various radiation products including reanalysis data (MERRA, ECMWF, NCEP) and satellite-derived products (GLASS, ISCCP) showed low correlation and large product errors in south China, resulting in large uncertainties in the GPP simulations driven by those data . The R 2 values of R se in this study were higher than that reported by Liu et al (2009b) based on sunshine duration with the R 2 varied between 0.61 and 0.89 with an average of 0.82 among 31 stations in China. The non-systematic estimation error expressed in terms of RMSE at Qianyanzhou site was 2.18 MJ m À2 day À2 (relative RMSE 20%), within the range reported by Supit and Van Kappel (1998), i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous study also found that various radiation products including reanalysis data (MERRA, ECMWF, NCEP) and satellite-derived products (GLASS, ISCCP) showed low correlation and large product errors in south China, resulting in large uncertainties in the GPP simulations driven by those data . The R 2 values of R se in this study were higher than that reported by Liu et al (2009b) based on sunshine duration with the R 2 varied between 0.61 and 0.89 with an average of 0.82 among 31 stations in China. The non-systematic estimation error expressed in terms of RMSE at Qianyanzhou site was 2.18 MJ m À2 day À2 (relative RMSE 20%), within the range reported by Supit and Van Kappel (1998), i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The Å ngströ m-Prescott equation, which calculates R s as a function of the extraterrestrial radiation on horizontal surface (R 0 ) has been widely used (Bakirci, 2009;Besharat et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2009b). Meanwhile, many alternative models have been proposed for calculating R s based on sunshine duration measurements (Besharat et al, 2013).…”
Section: Estimation Of Solar Radiation Using Sunshine Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dornelas et al (2006) e Carvalho et al (2011 encontraram, analisando a distribuição da mesma correlação apenas para superfícies horizontais, valores de R² acima de 0,81 e 0,82, em diferentes agrupamentos de dados, para Brasília (DF) e Seropédica (RJ), respectivamente. Liu et al (2009) verificaram, para partições diárias em 31 cidades chinesas, em agrupamentos anuais, valores de R² variando entre 0,61 e 0,89.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Neste contexto, a radiação solar pode ser considerada a fonte de energia primária para o ambiente, pois, influencia os fenômenos meteorológicos, processos físicos e bioquímicos que ocorrem no planeta. Existe uma demanda crescente por informações locais da radiação solar para aplicações em simulações de crescimento de plantas (planejamento agropecuário), sistemas alternativos de produção de energia, conservação de alimentos, construções e ambiência e modelos de transferência solovegetação-atmosfera, entre outros (Almorox et al 2005;Liu et al 2009;Carvalho et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…For example, the A-P model has been modified by adding more climate variables into the original equation [11] or changing the order of the relative sunshine duration [12]. However, some studies show that those modifications are not always showing any advantages comparing to the original equation [13,14]. The H-S model proposed by Hargreaves and Samani has also been modified with different equations in various places but the improvements of those modifications are various from different regions [8] and the modified versions sometimes even perform worse [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%