2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00044-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of position and angular data from a magnetic tracking device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Flock of Birds Ascension system has been validated for tracking humeral movements, producing trial-by-trial interclass correlation coefficients for axial humerus rotation in both loaded and non-loaded conditions in excess of 0.96 [9]. The field distortion has been shown to be the cause of error in excess of 5° at a distance of 2 m from an extended range transmitter [10], but increases in instrumental sensitivity have reduced this error to near 10° prior to system calibration and 2° following system calibration [11,12]. Previously-established techniques were used to calibrate the system prior to data collection [10][11][12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Flock of Birds Ascension system has been validated for tracking humeral movements, producing trial-by-trial interclass correlation coefficients for axial humerus rotation in both loaded and non-loaded conditions in excess of 0.96 [9]. The field distortion has been shown to be the cause of error in excess of 5° at a distance of 2 m from an extended range transmitter [10], but increases in instrumental sensitivity have reduced this error to near 10° prior to system calibration and 2° following system calibration [11,12]. Previously-established techniques were used to calibrate the system prior to data collection [10][11][12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other sources of error associated with magnetic tracking systems (Day, Murdoch and Dumas 2000), as well as ultrasonic tracking systems (O'Donnell., et al 1994) which are related to parameters associated with their respective hardware.…”
Section: Tracking Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2001;Youdas, J.W. et al 1991) potentiometer-based tools, (Feipel, V. et al 1999) as well as more advanced technologies such as ultrasonic (Dvir, Z. et al 2006;Dvir, Z. and Prushansky, T. 2000), optic (Marcotte, J. et al 2002), and electromagnetic (Day, J.S. et al 2000;Koerhuis, C.L.…”
Section: Cervical Range Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%