2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-014-1145-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of tracking error in image-guided neurosurgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though multiple indirect methods have been proposed to limit brain shift associated errors (ultrasounds, stereovision, etc. (Fan et al, 2016, Gerard and Collins, 2015, Prada et al, 2014, Sun et al, 2005)), the best currently available solution for WMT comparisons to DES is the direct use of data from intra-operative MRI. We summarize the existing literature in Table 1.…”
Section: Supratentorial Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though multiple indirect methods have been proposed to limit brain shift associated errors (ultrasounds, stereovision, etc. (Fan et al, 2016, Gerard and Collins, 2015, Prada et al, 2014, Sun et al, 2005)), the best currently available solution for WMT comparisons to DES is the direct use of data from intra-operative MRI. We summarize the existing literature in Table 1.…”
Section: Supratentorial Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though image distortion produced by a 1.5 T MRI is less than 0.5 mm and acceptable for performing procedures, the current state of imaging accuracy should be improved (42). A recent study reported that errors associated with tracking, tool calibration and registration played a significant role in IGN and should be corrected for surgical accuracy (43).…”
Section: Pitfalls and Trouble Shootings In Ignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closed-form equations for propagating the uncertainty of the measured markers to the pose were derived in [7,8] while the influence of bias in the marker locations on the pose was studied in [9]. The analytical formulas derived in these papers for different noise models were tested in both computer simulations and camera-based tracking systems [10,11]. The formulas enabled the optimization of marker placement so that the error propagated to a specific point using noisy, inaccurate registration could be minimized [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%