Modeling Dynamic Systems
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-21555-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of Large Spatial Models: A Multistage, Multiobjective Optimization Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The six target variables were combined hierarchically into a model performance index (MPI; Villa et al 2004). The basic criteria (indicated by the prefix 'c_') were defined by the minimum of the ratio of the simulated value to the reference value and their inverse ratio.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The six target variables were combined hierarchically into a model performance index (MPI; Villa et al 2004). The basic criteria (indicated by the prefix 'c_') were defined by the minimum of the ratio of the simulated value to the reference value and their inverse ratio.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using parasite transmission models for producing regional-scale intervention predictions presents a number of difficulties, which chiefly arise from the heterogeneity that underlies infection patterns across a spatial domain [ 17 , 18 , 55 58 ]. At the heart of these challenges is the problem of how best to scale transmission processes up from the local setting to predict phenomena at coarser hierarchical scales of space and time, particularly when inference on aggregate properties of entities of interest is based on models developed using components and processes estimated at small fine-scale levels [ 55 – 57 , 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using parasite transmission models for producing regional-scale intervention predictions presents a number of difficulties, which chiefly arise from the heterogeneity that underlies infection patterns across a spatial domain [17,18,[55][56][57][58]. At the heart of these challenges is the problem of how best to scale transmission processes up from the local setting to predict phenomena at coarser hierarchical scales of space and time, particularly when inference on aggregate properties of entities of interest is based on models developed using components and processes estimated at small fine-scale levels [55-57, 59, 60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) for conducting the search, analysis, and integration of the required data, and, on the other, given gaps in these data, also consideration of how to best estimate the needed localized data using various methods of interpolation or prediction (see Methods). These vagaries in the type of input data, whether contributed by the limited availability of measured data at the scale of modeling (MDA coverages) or through errors in the data estimated for sample sites (by mapping (e.g., mf prevalence, VC coverage), modelbased predictions (e.g., ABR values), or derivations (mf age prevalences)), mean that errors in model calibration and therefore in the precision of our predictions are inevitable [58]. While this cautions against the uncritical use of the present modeling results, it is also important to realize that this limitation in data for undertaking spatially structured modeling is partly procedural and therefore fixable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%