2022
DOI: 10.1137/21m1417946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of Inexact Computer Models with Heteroscedastic Errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When dealing with replicated physical experiments, it is not uncommon to encounter heteroscedasticity. In response to this challenge, Sung et al (2022) have introduced a new statistical model that facilitates the estimation of calibration parameters and the generation of predictions in the presence of heteroscedasticity. Specifically, they consider an inputdependent error model:…”
Section: Heteroscedastic Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When dealing with replicated physical experiments, it is not uncommon to encounter heteroscedasticity. In response to this challenge, Sung et al (2022) have introduced a new statistical model that facilitates the estimation of calibration parameters and the generation of predictions in the presence of heteroscedasticity. Specifically, they consider an inputdependent error model:…”
Section: Heteroscedastic Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dealing with replicated physical experiments, it is not uncommon to encounter heteroscedasticity. In response to this challenge, Sung et al (2022) have introduced a new statistical model that facilitates the estimation of calibration parameters and the generation of predictions in the presence of heteroscedasticity. Specifically, they consider an input‐dependent error model: yipgoodbreak=f(),boldxipθgoodbreak+δ()boldxipgoodbreak+normalϵ()boldxip,$$ {y}_i^p=f\left({\mathbf{x}}_i^p,\boldsymbol{\theta} \right)+\delta \left({\mathbf{x}}_i^p\right)+\upvarepsilon \left({\mathbf{x}}_i^p\right), $$ where the measurement error follows an independent normal distribution with heteroscedastic variance, that is, normalϵ()xscriptN(),0r()x$$ \upvarepsilon \left(\mathbf{x}\right)\sim \mathcal{N}\left(0,r\left(\mathbf{x}\right)\right) $$.…”
Section: Applications In Diverse Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations