Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
DOI: 10.1109/robot.1994.351262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of a parallel robot using multiple kinematic closed loops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nahvi and Hollerbach [13] proposed the minimum singular value of X as an observability index, here termed O 3 . The minimum singular value uses the worst observability of the parameter error as the criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nahvi and Hollerbach [13] proposed the minimum singular value of X as an observability index, here termed O 3 . The minimum singular value uses the worst observability of the parameter error as the criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the problem of optimal pose selection for calibration experiments have been studied in a number of works [36,[39][40][41][42][43][44], where several scalar criteria were proposed to defined this type of optimality in formal way. The main drawback of these approaches is that the relevant optimization objectives are not directly related to the manipulator positioning accuracy and its targeted industrial application (they usually focus on the parameter identification accuracy).…”
Section: Influence Of the Measurement Errors On The Identification Acmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these works, in order to compare the plans of experiments, several quantitative performance measures have been proposed and used as the objectives of the optimization problem associated with the optimal sets of measurement poses. In defining the objectives, the authors in [35,[40][41][42] proposed some observability indices, which are based on the singular values of the identification Jacobian (condition number, for instance). These indices have been examined and compared in [38,39,43,44], where the authors paid more attention to developing efficient numerical algorithms, such as genetic algorithm, Tabu search, DETMAX and also hybrid methods in order to obtain the optimal measurement configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However perfect measurements do not exist and is necessary to choose best calibration poses. There exist approaches [4,32], where a noise amplification index is used to identify poses in which errors in the parameters of the robot are especially critical; this is given when a calibration pose is near from a singularity or from workspace boundaries. However in a practical calibration process, if poses are extremely near of singularities, those poses are able to produce unpredictable movements (due to kinematic errors).…”
Section: A Selection Of Calibration Posesmentioning
confidence: 99%