2018
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v38n1p55-63/2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and Validation of the Swat Hydrological Model for the Mucuri River Basin

Abstract: Hydrological models are becoming more and more widespread, mainly due to their capacity to simulate the impact of environmental changes on water resources. In this way, the aim of this study was to calibrate and validate the SWAT model for the soil and climatic conditions of the Mucuri River Basin, located in the Northeast region of the States of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The SWAT-CUP software module SUFI2 was used to analyze the sensitivity, calibration and validation of the model. The calibration was performed i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The SWAT model, developed by the USDA Agriculture Research Service, is designed to model hydrology at the scale of a watershed [36]. The SWAT model is structured on fundamental components of action, such as: Climate, hydrology, sediment, nutrients and management [51][52][53] and can be used to predict the variation in these components by change in land use and climate. SWAT follows a defined operating sequence; (1) data preparation, (2) discretization of sub-basins and definition of HRUs, (3) sensitivity analysis, (4) parameter calibration and (5) validation.…”
Section: Hydrological Swat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SWAT model, developed by the USDA Agriculture Research Service, is designed to model hydrology at the scale of a watershed [36]. The SWAT model is structured on fundamental components of action, such as: Climate, hydrology, sediment, nutrients and management [51][52][53] and can be used to predict the variation in these components by change in land use and climate. SWAT follows a defined operating sequence; (1) data preparation, (2) discretization of sub-basins and definition of HRUs, (3) sensitivity analysis, (4) parameter calibration and (5) validation.…”
Section: Hydrological Swat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies, 20 hydrologic parameters were considered ( Table 5). These parameters were described according to their existence among the main flow rate variable calibration parameters [51]. SUFI-2 begins with wide ranges of meaningful parameters that capture most of the observed data within the 95PPU and then iteratively decreases the uncertainty of the parameters [69].…”
Section: The Sufi-2 Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they also pointed out that substantial baseflow is essential to maintain sound stream ecosystems in the LEC watershed. In their attempt to minimize the runoff impact of urbanization in the LEC, Tang et al [41] [29,44,45,46] and can be used to predict the variation in these components by change in land use and climate.…”
Section: Description and Literature Review Of The Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this algorithm, several sources of uncertainties, such as conceptual Based on previous studies, 20 hydrologic parameters were considered (Table 2). These parameters were described according to their existence among the main flow rate variable calibration parameters [45]. SUFI-2 begins with wide ranges of meaningful parameters that capture most of the observed data within the 95PPU and then iteratively decreases the uncertainty of the parameters [61].…”
Section: The Sufi-2 Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the calibration step (2006 until 2009) and validation (2010 until 2015) of the monthly streamflow (m 3 /s) for each one of the analyzed gauging stations can be seen in Figure 5. It is noticeable that both in the calibration period and in the validation one, the SWAT model exhibit a great adjustment, according to the classification written by Almeida et al (2018). In which the model is considered great if 0.75 < NS < 1.00, |PBIAS| < 10 and 0.75 < R 2 < 1.00.…”
Section: Calibration and Validation Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%