2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.155307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of vertical and horizontal mobilities in InAs/GaSb superlattices

Abstract: Superlattice (SL) devices such as infrared detectors and quantum-cascade lasers rely on efficient transport of carriers perpendicular to the SL layers by drift and/or diffusion. While horizontal mobilities are measured routinely, measurements of perpendicular-carrier mobilities require nonstandard experimental techniques such as the geometric magneto-resistance. Here we show how perpendicular mobilities can be estimated from horizontal mobility measurements and calculated mobilities. We treat low-temperature h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Âju k 0 z ðÀaÞj 2 Âju k z ðÀaÞj 2 ) dðEðkÞÀEðk 0 ÞÞ: (14) This equation encapsulates the essential difference between the calculations of Szmulowicz et al 17 and the work presented in this paper. In particular, Szmulowicz et al have assumed that the periodic boundary conditions (and, hence, the wave-function moduli) at z ¼ 6a are equal, whereas in our model we have used ju kz ðaÞj 2 6 ¼ ju kz ðÀaÞj 2 , and we have substituted the exact value of the wave function at each interface.…”
Section: Interface Roughness Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Âju k 0 z ðÀaÞj 2 Âju k z ðÀaÞj 2 ) dðEðkÞÀEðk 0 ÞÞ: (14) This equation encapsulates the essential difference between the calculations of Szmulowicz et al 17 and the work presented in this paper. In particular, Szmulowicz et al have assumed that the periodic boundary conditions (and, hence, the wave-function moduli) at z ¼ 6a are equal, whereas in our model we have used ju kz ðaÞj 2 6 ¼ ju kz ðÀaÞj 2 , and we have substituted the exact value of the wave function at each interface.…”
Section: Interface Roughness Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For this superlattice, the vertical and horizontal effective masses are very similar, but there can be substantial differences between vertical and horizontal scattering times because of interface roughness. [41][42][43] We believe the different scattering times led to the observed electron mobility anisotropy, not the different vertical and horizontal electron effective masses. We should also remark that the conductivity effective masses reported here are computed for equilibrium carrier populations.…”
Section: Type-ii Superlattice Hole Conductivity Effective Massmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…µ h , τ h and µ e , τ e are assumed to be 300 cm 2 /Vs, 4 ns and 3000 cm 2 /Vs, 4 ns, respectively. These assumptions are based on the published literature [19][20][21][22][23] and [17,19,[24][25][26]]. …”
Section: Diffusion Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%