2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2010.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of surface tension of metals using density gradient theory and PC-SAFT equation of state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DGT is rooted in the early treatment of van der Waals, which is re-discovered and popularized by Cahn and Hilliard . Although DGT has proven to provide a good representation of the interfacial tension, it needs an influence parameter for pure fluids and adjustable parameters for mixtures, which have to be estimated from experimental interfacial tension data. Therefore, the predictive capability of the approach inevitably declines in the case of mixtures. Meanwhile, DFT is constructed on the minimized free energy functional of the interface, which has shown some advantages over DGT since these influence parameters are no longer needed. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DGT is rooted in the early treatment of van der Waals, which is re-discovered and popularized by Cahn and Hilliard . Although DGT has proven to provide a good representation of the interfacial tension, it needs an influence parameter for pure fluids and adjustable parameters for mixtures, which have to be estimated from experimental interfacial tension data. Therefore, the predictive capability of the approach inevitably declines in the case of mixtures. Meanwhile, DFT is constructed on the minimized free energy functional of the interface, which has shown some advantages over DGT since these influence parameters are no longer needed. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several versions of the SAFT approach have emerged, including SAFT-VR, , soft-SAFT, PC-SAFT, SAFT-γ, , and FMSA-SAFT . Some of them have been employed to describe the interfacial properties of fluids and fluid mixtures, such as PC-SAFT, , soft-SAFT, and SAFT-VR. ,, Although these practical calculations yield encouraging results, their further improvement is difficult: a common dissatisfaction of PC-SAFT, soft-SAFT, and SAFT-VR is their accompanying mixing rules, especially for unsymmetrical mixtures, such as nonpolar–polar, nonpolar–associating, and polar–associating systems. The main reason lies in their inaccurate distribution functions of different fluid molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, several methods have been presented for the estimation of IL properties (Jacquemin et al, 2008a, Jacquemin et al, 2008b, Lazzús, 2009, Gardas and Coutinho, 2009, Huang et al, 2013, Mousazadeh and Faramarzi, 2011. Among them, GC-based methods are popular since these methods can be used easily and they are also the basis of using the CAMD method, which in a systematic manner can identify optimal ILs containing the desired properties for specific applications confidently and rapidly, as mentioned above.…”
Section: Gc-based Property Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, some semiempirical models were built with DGT plus the cubic EOSs . In addition, some theory based EOSs such as the Sanchez–Lacombe EOS, the associating perturbed anisotropic chain theory, the statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT), the perturbed‐chain SAFT (PC‐SAFT), and the soft‐SAFT, were also connected with DGT to describe the surface tensions for different fluids. Similar to DGT, DFT also treated the densities across two bulk phases as a continuous function and were combined with EOS for the computation of surface tension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%