Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of Energy Level Alignment and Interface Electronic Structure in Molecular Junctions beyond DFT

Abstract: In atomistic simulations of molecular junctions, it is important to develop methods beyond density-functional theory (DFT) to describe the interface electronic structure and alignment of frontier molecular orbitals accurately. Here we describe a first-principles approach for molecular junctions that extends the DFT+Σ method, an approximate scheme based on self-energy corrections. The DFT+Σtot method presented here acts on junction states and introduces corrections to DFT-based molecular frontier orbitals not o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both molecules, this σ resonance peaks is at −1.5 eV, but its coupling at the Fermi energy is overall lower in BI than in Im. The calculated conductance values of Im and BI are 6.4 × 10 –2 G 0 and 4.2 × 10 –2 G 0 , respectively, in reasonably good agreement with the experimentally determined values for the G1 peak listed in Table . ,, …”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both molecules, this σ resonance peaks is at −1.5 eV, but its coupling at the Fermi energy is overall lower in BI than in Im. The calculated conductance values of Im and BI are 6.4 × 10 –2 G 0 and 4.2 × 10 –2 G 0 , respectively, in reasonably good agreement with the experimentally determined values for the G1 peak listed in Table . ,, …”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The calculated conductance values of Im and BI are 6.4 × 10 −2 G 0 and 4.2 × 10 −2 G 0 , respectively, in reasonably good agreement with the experimentally determined values for the G1 peak listed in Table 1. 5,36,37 Next, we calculate the conducting properties of Im and BI dimers (2Im and 2BI) to investigate the experimentally determined G2 values. We built junctions with molecular dimers and optimized the interface geometry, where no restrictions are imposed on the geometry of the molecules.…”
Section: T H I S C O N T E N T Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,21] For PPD, we find 4.2 × 10 −2 to 8.0 × 10 −2 G 0 , very close to 4.6 × 10 −2 G 0 , [44] 4.3 × 10 −2 G 0 , [45] 2.4 × 10 −2 G 0 , [46] and 5.5 × 10 −2 G 0 . [47,48] The distance range shown in Figure 5 is consistent with the length of each molecule. For a given molecule, the spectra show relatively small changes over the different electrode separations.…”
Section: (5 Of 7)supporting
confidence: 65%
“…[ 6,21 ] For PPD, we find 4.2 × 10 −2 to 8.0 × 10 −2 G 0 , very close to 4.6 × 10 −2 G 0 , [ 44 ] 4.3 × 10 −2 G 0 , [ 45 ] 2.4 × 10 −2 G 0 , [ 46 ] and 5.5 × 10 −2 G 0 . [ 47,48 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFT is generalizable and widely applicable. Its computational cost makes metal–molecule interfaces with several hundreds of atoms widely accessible, , and, despite limitations in the calculation of molecular-level alignment, yields an accurate picture of structural, thermal, and electronic properties of molecular junctions. , Most DFT studies, however, have focused on static properties of the junction, as determined by stable geometries obtained by calculations at zero temperature which minimize the forces or total energy. , Exploring the dynamics of metal–molecule junctions within DFT is a very onerous task because of the computational cost of simulations over sufficiently long timescales . For example, in the context of single-molecule conductance, where the molecule is placed between two nanosized electrodes, MD simulations using DFT have investigated the notoriously complex interface geometries of thiolate-linked molecules on Au. However, these simulations are limited to a few picoseconds due to the computational costs of DFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%