1998
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/91.1.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of Capture Thread Length in Orb Webs: Evaluation of New Formulae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general web architecture is thought to be genetically determined (Foelix 1992). Capture area and capture thread length increased significantly with carapace width in this study, a result also reported by Heiling et al (1998). A large capture area results in high prey interception (Chacon & Eberhard 1980), and by increasing the distance between sticky spirals, spiders may enlarge the overall capture area without increasing their energy expenditure (Herberstein et al 2000).…”
Section: Prey Typesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The general web architecture is thought to be genetically determined (Foelix 1992). Capture area and capture thread length increased significantly with carapace width in this study, a result also reported by Heiling et al (1998). A large capture area results in high prey interception (Chacon & Eberhard 1980), and by increasing the distance between sticky spirals, spiders may enlarge the overall capture area without increasing their energy expenditure (Herberstein et al 2000).…”
Section: Prey Typesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Hence, web-building effort used to be directly estimated by means of web size and/or thread length of webs (Witt et al 1968;Sherman 1994;Heiling et al 1998;Nakata and Ushimaru 1999;Venner et al 2001). However, here we have demonstrated that neither web size nor amount of silk used per web could be considered direct indicators of a spider's energetic investment devoted to foraging: despite using less silk to build their webs and building smaller webs, heavier spiders still spent more energy in web building.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We measured webs from digital photos using imagej (National Institutes of Health, USA) and took the measurements summarized in Table (see also Figure ). Capture thread length (CTL), the total length of sticky capture spiral, was estimated using the large‐scale formula of Heiling, Herberstein, and Spitzer ():CTL=Tl+Ts/2×xi,where for a given sector i of the web, x i is the number of rows of capture thread, T l is the length of the outermost (longest) row of capture thread, and T s is the length of the innermost (shortest) row of capture thread.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%