1988
DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90026-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of canopy bidirectional reflectance using the Monte Carlo method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A peak is also found in the TM4 region in the direction of the hot spot, i.e., 0v = -30 ø (for review of this effect see Qin and Goel [1995]), which is more noticeable when the vegetation is denser. We can observe that reflectance is moderately symmetrical relative to both sides of nadir, in agreement with other authors [Ross and Marshak, 1988]. In the visible regions (e.g., TM3), scattering properties of the soil have a dominant contribution, due to its higher brightness.…”
Section: Brf Of Simulated Scenessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A peak is also found in the TM4 region in the direction of the hot spot, i.e., 0v = -30 ø (for review of this effect see Qin and Goel [1995]), which is more noticeable when the vegetation is denser. We can observe that reflectance is moderately symmetrical relative to both sides of nadir, in agreement with other authors [Ross and Marshak, 1988]. In the visible regions (e.g., TM3), scattering properties of the soil have a dominant contribution, due to its higher brightness.…”
Section: Brf Of Simulated Scenessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Leaves shadow each other, and the far field approximation is not valid anymore. The best way to handle this type of difficulty is to model the full three-dimensional structure of plant canopies with such tools as ray tracing (e.g., [Ross and Marshak 1988], [Govaerts and Verstraete 1998]) or radiosity (e.g., [Borel et al 1991], [Goel et al 1991…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is effect of finite sizes of the foliage (Kuusk, 1991;Nilson, 1991), which in turn causes the canopy hot spot effect, i.e. a sharp increase in canopy reflected radiation when scattering direction Ω approaches the direction to the sun Ω 0 (Kuusk, 1991;Nilson, 1991;Qin et al, 1996;Ross and Marshak, 1988). Second, with the increase in the angle between Ω 0 and Ω, the correlation decreases from its maximum to zero, and then levels off (Fig.…”
Section: Stochastic Reflecting Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflectance of vegetation reaches its maximum in the backscattering direction. This phenomenon is known as the hot spot effect (Gerstl, 1999;Knyazikhin and Marshak, 1991;Kuusk, 1991;Qin et al, 1996;Ross and Marshak, 1988). It has been widely recognized that the hot spot region represents the most information-rich directions in the directional distribution of canopy reflected radiation (Gerstl, 1999;Goel et al, 1997;Qin et al, 2002;Ross and Marshak, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%