1998
DOI: 10.1029/98gl00383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of soil anisotropy on the radiance field emerging from vegetation canopies

Abstract: Formulation of the Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated RPV model values were compared with an independent set of measurements and also presented an adequate Correlation Coefficient. Contrary to canopy reflectance measurements [13,15], our results presented the strongest anisotropy in the forward scattering direction indicating the importance and the dominant role of canopy architecture in the total reflectance signal of a scene. Higher correlations were found in lower zenith angles and especially at nadir position.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationscontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulated RPV model values were compared with an independent set of measurements and also presented an adequate Correlation Coefficient. Contrary to canopy reflectance measurements [13,15], our results presented the strongest anisotropy in the forward scattering direction indicating the importance and the dominant role of canopy architecture in the total reflectance signal of a scene. Higher correlations were found in lower zenith angles and especially at nadir position.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…To date, the model was mainly used to simulate reflectance of non-flat canopy targets that present a backscattering behaviour, in contrast with single leaf characteristics. However, the spectral and directional scattering properties of leaves, which are spatially distributed inside a crown/canopy, and ground reflectance properties, are important factors contributing to the BRDF signal of a canopy target [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LAI estimates in forest plots and in reference parcels (extreme values) are shown in columns 7 and 8 of Table 1, respectively. Bare soil, rock and soil covered with different types of litter represented the ground conditions of all forest plots. In the presence of forest plots with sparse canopy or low LAI, an optical characterization of the understory was necessary (Pinty et al, 1998). The direct appraisal of the optical properties in the field was hindered by the heterogeneous ground conditions.…”
Section: Optical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bidirectional reflectance property of vegetative earth surfaces results from factors such as the scattering process within the canopy layer, leaf angle distribution and orientation, thickness and size of leaves, crowns and their spatial distribution [3-5], as well as the underlying ground-soil properties such as roughness, color, and organic matter content [6]. Furthermore, not only the radiation transfer modeling community is interested in the BRDF of vegetation but also the computer graphics scientists [7-8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%