2021
DOI: 10.1002/jccs.202100213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of anharmonic effect on the reactions of small sulfur‐containing molecules with NO/NO2 in combustion

Abstract: Nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides are the main pollutants that destroy the atmosphere, the emission and control of which have received wide attention.Notably, the interactions between nitrogen species and sulfur species occur extensively in combustion and the atmosphere. This article summarizes the 12 reactions of small sulfur-containing molecules with NO/NO 2 in combus-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the above equation, A stands for the pre‐exponential factor, n stands for the temperature exponent, Ea stands for the activation energy, R stands for the universal gas constant (8.314 J·mol −1 ·K −1 ), respectively [28, 37, 38, 41–43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above equation, A stands for the pre‐exponential factor, n stands for the temperature exponent, Ea stands for the activation energy, R stands for the universal gas constant (8.314 J·mol −1 ·K −1 ), respectively [28, 37, 38, 41–43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it can be used to calculate harmonic rate constants and anharmonic rate constants accurately. Many articles [24][25][26][27][28] have applied this method, combined with RRKM (Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus) theory, TS (Transition state) theory, and other methods to calculate the anharmonic rate constants and harmonic rate constants of unimolecular dissociations. The comparison between theoretical data and experimental data shows that the anharmonic rate constants calculated by YL method are close to the experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%