2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcium looping for CO2 capture: sorbent enhancement through doping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among all the solid CO 2 sorbents, CaO is a proper material to act as CO 2 carrier because of numerous advantages [41,42]: (1) low cost since it can be derived from limestone that is readily available; (2) non-toxic to the environment; (3) the spent materials can be further used in the cement industry after decarburization, supporting sustainable development in economy; (4) CaO may also serve as an alkaline catalyst in biomass conversion processes; and (5) the heat from the exothermic carbonation of CaO can be retrieved to compensate the high heat requirement during chemical looping. However, it is well known that the reactivity decay over cycles of CaO-based CO 2 sorbents, particularly natural material-based sorbents, is inevitable.…”
Section: Materials For Chemical Loopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all the solid CO 2 sorbents, CaO is a proper material to act as CO 2 carrier because of numerous advantages [41,42]: (1) low cost since it can be derived from limestone that is readily available; (2) non-toxic to the environment; (3) the spent materials can be further used in the cement industry after decarburization, supporting sustainable development in economy; (4) CaO may also serve as an alkaline catalyst in biomass conversion processes; and (5) the heat from the exothermic carbonation of CaO can be retrieved to compensate the high heat requirement during chemical looping. However, it is well known that the reactivity decay over cycles of CaO-based CO 2 sorbents, particularly natural material-based sorbents, is inevitable.…”
Section: Materials For Chemical Loopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other tests with KCl and K 2 CO 3 using wet impregnation were performed using two types of limestone (Havelock and Imeco) [80]. González et al [80] and Mg(NO 3 ) 2 ) and the Grignard reagent (isopropyl-magnesium chloride) [82].…”
Section: Dopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, NaCl markedly decreased the CO2 capture of the treated lime when tested in a FBC compared to the untreated material. Other materials such as KCl and K2CO3, 48 manganese salts, 49 MgCl and Mg(NO3)2, 50 and CaBr2 51,52 have also produced improvement in pore structure, pore volume and pore size. However, in some cases, alkali-metal precursors used as dopants, such as, lithium chloride produced poorer performance in the treated sample than for natural limestone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%