2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02527-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcification characteristics of porcine stented valves in a juvenile sheep model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Host metabolism and reaction to foreign material, tissue structure, mechanical stress, and valve processing [2,[5][6][7][8] have all been claimed to play a role in tissue valve calcification, which may be either intrinsic or extrinsic to cuspal tissue, and in structural tissue derangement, which may be independent from calcium deposition. Thus far, all researchers have addressed this specific issue and the above-mentioned factors potentially responsible for postoperative valve failure by working on different kinds of valve design or pre-implant tissue treatment to reduce or avoid postoperative degeneration [2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Strategies to prevent tissue calcification, inhibitors of hydroxyapatite formation, calcium diffusion inhibitors, peculiar material processing methods to reduce tissue material to calcification, and improved glutaraldehyde or non-glutaraldehyde tissue fixation have been variably investigated and proposed [2], but no approach or medical therapy, to our knowledge, has focused on post-implant treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Host metabolism and reaction to foreign material, tissue structure, mechanical stress, and valve processing [2,[5][6][7][8] have all been claimed to play a role in tissue valve calcification, which may be either intrinsic or extrinsic to cuspal tissue, and in structural tissue derangement, which may be independent from calcium deposition. Thus far, all researchers have addressed this specific issue and the above-mentioned factors potentially responsible for postoperative valve failure by working on different kinds of valve design or pre-implant tissue treatment to reduce or avoid postoperative degeneration [2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Strategies to prevent tissue calcification, inhibitors of hydroxyapatite formation, calcium diffusion inhibitors, peculiar material processing methods to reduce tissue material to calcification, and improved glutaraldehyde or non-glutaraldehyde tissue fixation have been variably investigated and proposed [2], but no approach or medical therapy, to our knowledge, has focused on post-implant treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological prostheses today offer a reliable and effective International Journal of Cardiology 141 (2010) 68 -74 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcard solution for valve replacement to treat cardiac native valve dysfunction without the need for anticoagulation and better hemodynamics as compared to mechanical substitutes. Postoperative tissue degeneration, however, remains a critical issue and represents the most frequent cause of reoperation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Several agents or new tissueprocessing techniques have been variably applied during tissue valve manufacturing and proposed to reduce or prevent tissue degeneration, but no postoperative therapy has been specifically and prospectively investigated to counteract biological tissue derangement, calcification and inflammation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foram usados também bezerros e suínos para este propósito (6,7) e em ovinos por vários autores (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) , mostrando que estes são os animais de grande porte mais usados para estudos experimentais.…”
Section: Animalunclassified
“…Glutaraldehyde crosslinking is generally used in xenogenic bioprotheses to make connective tissue matrices resistant to degeneration and to reduce antigenicity. Flameng et al [10] showed that in general there is an important difference between leafl et and wall calcifi cation in commercially available bioprostheses. The anticalcifi cation treatments normally achieved good results at the level of the leafl ets, however at the wall, strong structural deterioration is seen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%