2011
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2011.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cadmium selenide: Surface and nanoparticle energetics

Abstract: Cadmium selenide (CdSe) belongs to a class of important II-VI semiconductors widely used in optical, sensor, and laser materials and quantum-dot light-emitting diodes. Here we present the first direct calorimetric measurement of the surface energy of wurtzite CdSe. CdSe nanoparticles with particle size between 20 and 60 nm were prepared by a hydrothermal method without additives to control morphology, and the surface energy was derived from the drop solution enthalpies in molten sodium molybdate and from water… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our simulations of small CdSe nanoparticles (not the subject of the present report) yielded the following values of surface energy for low-index atomic surfaces: 2.18 eV/atom for (100), 2.11 eV/atom for (110), 1.78 eV/atom for (111)A, and 2.40ev/atom for (111)B surfaces. This is in general agreement with the experimental values reported in the literature (Xu et al 2011 ). The differences between various surfaces naturally reflect the density of the broken atomic bonds at the surface.…”
Section: Computationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our simulations of small CdSe nanoparticles (not the subject of the present report) yielded the following values of surface energy for low-index atomic surfaces: 2.18 eV/atom for (100), 2.11 eV/atom for (110), 1.78 eV/atom for (111)A, and 2.40ev/atom for (111)B surfaces. This is in general agreement with the experimental values reported in the literature (Xu et al 2011 ). The differences between various surfaces naturally reflect the density of the broken atomic bonds at the surface.…”
Section: Computationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the experimental measurement of two dimensional energetic properties like the surface formation energy is difficult and it can give ambiguous results because extremely clean materials are needed, in which the uniformity of the exposed surface is insured, which is oen not the case. 20 The difficulties related to experimentally obtaining an accurate description of the electronic and geometric properties at an atomistic scale further valorize the use of theoretical methods. Computational approaches have proven to be useful tools to simulate both bulk and surface properties of semiconductors, 21,22 as well as adsorption of ligands or functional molecules on their surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is one of the cleavage surfaces of the wurtzite structure, besides the (11À20) surface. It has been studied extensively both at the experimental 10,12 and theoretical levels. 66,67 The experimental measurement of two dimensional energetic properties like the surface formation energy is difficult and it can give ambiguous results because extremely clean materials are needed, in which the uniformity of the exposed surface is assured, which is often not the case.…”
Section: Cdse Wurtzite 10à10 Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Its wurtzite and zinc blende polymorphs are the two stable phases under ambient conditions. 9 Several experimental [10][11][12] and theoretical studies 9,[13][14][15][16][17] examined its bulk and surface properties. From a modeling point of view, Wang et al gave a detailed description of the relaxation and the electronic structure of CdSe bulk crystals in both wurtzite and zinc blende phases, as well as the (10À10) and (11À20) cleavage surfaces 13 using an sp 3 semiempirical tight-binding model, and validated their theoretical investigation by comparing their results to bulk optical and X-ray photoemission data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%