2016 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on on-Line Testing and Robust System Design (IOLTS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iolts.2016.7604663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cache-aware reliability evaluation through LLVM-based analysis and fault injection

Abstract: 1-Reliability evaluation is a high costly process that is mainly carried out through fault injection or by means of analytical techniques. While the analytical techniques are fast but inaccurate, the fault injection is more accurate but extremely time consuming. This paper presents an hybrid approach combining analytical and fault injection techniques in order to evaluate the reliability of a computing system, by considering errors that affect both the data and the instruction cache. Compared to existing techn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to get an accurate picture of these proportions; for example, an application that experiences a large percentage of SDCs may require algorithmic error detection mechanisms, at the expense of runtime overhead. A concern in the HPC community is that a significant number of resilience studies have been based on this FI method [3,4,6,17,18,25,31,32,[34][35][36] (including our own work), which can potentially skew FI results and, in some cases, lead to incorrect conclusions. There has been research done in showing these inaccuracies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to get an accurate picture of these proportions; for example, an application that experiences a large percentage of SDCs may require algorithmic error detection mechanisms, at the expense of runtime overhead. A concern in the HPC community is that a significant number of resilience studies have been based on this FI method [3,4,6,17,18,25,31,32,[34][35][36] (including our own work), which can potentially skew FI results and, in some cases, lead to incorrect conclusions. There has been research done in showing these inaccuracies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang proposed an improved Bootstrap sampling method for the problem of difficulty in obtaining failure data and applied this method to reliability evaluation [3]. Kool proposed a technique to combine simulation data with fault monitoring data for reliability evaluation, which alleviates the high cost of reliability evaluation [4]. Wang proposed a risk assessment method for CNC lathes based on faulty data and the combination of fuzzy set theory and gray theory, which avoids the shortcomings of traditional RPN analysis and improves the reliability of CNC lathes [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%