2016 IEEE 34th VLSI Test Symposium (VTS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/vts.2016.7477299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cache- and register-aware system reliability evaluation based on data lifetime analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Figure 4 highlights, faults could propagate through the different hardware structures composing the full system. However, it could happen that they are masked during the propagation either at the technological or at the architectural level [42]. When a fault reaches the soft-…”
Section: Fault Injectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Figure 4 highlights, faults could propagate through the different hardware structures composing the full system. However, it could happen that they are masked during the propagation either at the technological or at the architectural level [42]. When a fault reaches the soft-…”
Section: Fault Injectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the previous techniques perform the analysis on a real processor, our approach uses the VISA of LLVM, which makes the evaluation less dependent from the hardware architecture. Using the same VISA, Kooli et al [15] use the lifetime analysis to compute the minimum percentage of failure probability of faults occurring in the data (RAM, data cache). Compared to this technique, the proposed approach computes the exact failure probability, and is able to target faults occurring in both data and instructions.…”
Section: B Analytical Reliability Evaluation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to evaluate the reliability of programs under the influence of soft errors. Moreover, the results of reliability analysis are useful for improving the error detection mechanisms [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al [22] proposed an empirical model to predict the SDC proneness of a program's data called SDCTune, which is based on static and dynamic features of the program extracted by performing fault injection experiments on a small set of benchmark programs. Kooli et al [3] used the concept of the variable lifetime and the variable residence to compute the percentage of masked faults in the RAM, data cache, and register files. G. Li et al [16] built a crash model based on the dynamic dependency graph and proposed an algorithm to analyze the propagation of given soft errors that have an impact on the program outputs, and to predict crashes on GPGPU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%