Bystander Responses to a Violent Incident in an Immersive Virtual Environment

Abstract

Under what conditions will a bystander intervene to try to stop a violent attack by one person on another? It is generally believed that the greater the size of the crowd of bystanders, the less the chance that any of them will intervene. A complementary model is that social identity is critical as an explanatory variable. For example, when the bystander shares common social identity with the victim the probability of intervention is enhanced, other things being equal. However, it is generally not possible to study such hypotheses experimentally for practical and ethical reasons. Here we show that an experiment that depicts a violent incident at life-size in immersive virtual reality lends support to the social identity explanation. 40 male supporters of Arsenal Football Club in England were recruited for a two-factor between-groups experiment: the victim was either an Arsenal supporter or not (in-group/out-group), and looked towards the participant for help or not during the confrontation. The response variables were the numbers of verbal and physical interventions by the participant during the violent argument. The number of physical interventions had a significantly greater mean in the in-group condition compared to the out-group. The more that participants perceived that the Victim was looking to them for help the greater the number of interventions in the in-group but not in the out-group. These results are supported by standard statistical analysis of variance, with more detailed findings obtained by a symbolic regression procedure based on genetic programming. Verbal interventions made during their experience, and analysis of post-experiment interview data suggest that in-group members were more prone to confrontational intervention compared to the out-group who were more prone to make statements to try to diffuse the situation.

Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: The challenges of exploring a new research landscape

“…For instance, to test participant's fear responses, VR was used to create a ‘room 101’ with disturbing events such as spiders crawling around, explosions, and a floor collapsing (McCall et al ., 2015). Studies from the Slater group include a recreation of the famous Milgram experiment where participants had to execute fatal electric shots to a virtual character (Slater et al ., 2006); a violent fight scenario (Slater et al ., 2013) and a moral dilemma with an active shooter (Pan & Slater, 2011). In the latter, participants thought their task was to operate a lift in a gallery in VR, but later were shocked to be confronted with a tough decision: A gunman entered the lift and started shooting, and within a few seconds they had to choose whether they should push a button to save five people but sacrificing one other, who would otherwise be fine.…”

Bystander Responses to Bullying at Work: The Role of Mode, Type and Relationship to Target

“…Bollmer et al 2005;Tajfel 1982). Research suggests relationship to target, and in-group membership promotes positive bystander intervention in physical violence (Slater et al 2013), street violence (Levine et al 2002), and sexual orientation harassment (Ryan and Wessel 2012). However, while studies identify the role of friendship in adopting certain bystander behaviours and roles in bullying (e.g.…”

A Social Identity Approach to Sport Psychology: Principles, Practice, and Prospects

“…For example, in Levine and colleagues' research, fans of Manchester United were asked to think about their team before being asked (for a spurious reason) to go to another building [110,111]. Then, on their way to that building, a man (a confederate) tripped and fell over in front of them.…”

“…It is then on this basis that leaders exert influence over other group members. In short, this is because it is only when leaders are seen as embodying 'who we are' and 'what we want to be' that their leadership engenders followership [125,111,149,150].…”