2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.japb.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Butterfly diversity in Kolkata, India: An appraisal for conservation management

Abstract: We investigate the Carter-like constant in the case of a particle moving in a nonrelativistic dipolar potential. This special case is a missing link between Carter constant in stationary axially symmetric spacetimes such as Kerr solution and its possible Newtonian counterpart. We use this system to carry over the definition of angular momentum from the Newtonian mechanics to the relativistic stationary axially symmetric spacetimes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although local determinants of diversity, such as competition and predation, remained undetermined in these studies, to a large extent, landscape characteristics influence butterfly richness and abundance in different geographic areas ( Öckinger et al 2006 ; Öckinger et al 2009 ). Spatial scale differences in butterfly diversity can be attributed to heterogeneity at the landscape level, while timescale differences can be attributed to changes in climatic conditions at both local and regional scales ( Mukherjee et al 2015 ). In the current context, it can be assumed that butterfly diversity varies in the four sampling sites as a matter of differences in pollutants concentration and composition of vegetation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although local determinants of diversity, such as competition and predation, remained undetermined in these studies, to a large extent, landscape characteristics influence butterfly richness and abundance in different geographic areas ( Öckinger et al 2006 ; Öckinger et al 2009 ). Spatial scale differences in butterfly diversity can be attributed to heterogeneity at the landscape level, while timescale differences can be attributed to changes in climatic conditions at both local and regional scales ( Mukherjee et al 2015 ). In the current context, it can be assumed that butterfly diversity varies in the four sampling sites as a matter of differences in pollutants concentration and composition of vegetation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on species diversity in urban ecosystems with air pollution problems are necessary to understand the effect of anthropogenic development on the integrity and livelihood of the ecosystem ( Mukherjee et al 2015 ). However, arthropods in such environments are poorly studied despite being crucial components and indicators of urban ecosystems and biodiversity ( McIntyre 2000 ; Magle et al 2012 ; Bonebrake and Cooper 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shannon information function ( H ), species richness ( S ), and Evenness ( E ) also can be used in ecological studies for SHE analysis, which examines the relationship among S , H , and E in the samples [ 31 ]. In this case, H = ln S + ln E and this decomposition formula expresses that relationship in one plot with three variables/curves that are plotted against the abundance ( N ) of the sample [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. At the same time, these variables form linear trends on a log scale, and when N accumulates with each sample, S usually increases [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the diversity indices of bird abundance, the data taken from each study site from three areas (U, SU and R) were analyzed separately by using Biodiversity Pro software (McAleece et al 1997, Biodiversity Professional; Scottish Association for Marine Science and the Natural History Museum, London, UK). Species richness (S) was calculated by summing the number of different species present in that area (Mukherjee et al 2015, Issa 2019). Diversity of species was represented by calculating Shannon diversity index [H'=-∑ (P i ln P i )], Simpson's Index of diversity , where P i is the proportion of total samples belonging to the i th species, n is the total number of birds belongs to a particular species and N includes the total number of birds of all species (Magurran 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%