1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-491x(97)86215-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“But is it fair?”: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
158
0
15

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
158
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Perceived subjectivity and lack of professionalism in the scoring of student assignments or examinations has led tertiary students to view assessment as arbitrary, irrelevant, inaccurate, and simply a necessary process for accruing marks (Duffield and Spencer 2002;Hawe 2002;Sambell et al 1997). Students are most likely to consider irrelevant assessment practices such as group projects that do not give credit to individual effort (Hoffman and Rogelberg 2001), those that lack explicit criteria for assessment (Maclellan 2001), and end-of-year examinations (Kniveton 1996).…”
Section: Assessment Is Irrelevantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perceived subjectivity and lack of professionalism in the scoring of student assignments or examinations has led tertiary students to view assessment as arbitrary, irrelevant, inaccurate, and simply a necessary process for accruing marks (Duffield and Spencer 2002;Hawe 2002;Sambell et al 1997). Students are most likely to consider irrelevant assessment practices such as group projects that do not give credit to individual effort (Hoffman and Rogelberg 2001), those that lack explicit criteria for assessment (Maclellan 2001), and end-of-year examinations (Kniveton 1996).…”
Section: Assessment Is Irrelevantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…regardless of purpose (i.e., accountability or improvement). Research into students' preferences for alternative assessments (such as portfolios, projects, self-assessment, peer-assessment, and other non-examination assessments) shows that the assessments that have been positively evaluated by students were more authentic and thus made learning more realistic or powerful (Andresen et al 1994;Slater 1996;Sambell et al 1997;Segers and Dochy 2001;Bloxham and West 2004). Slater (1996) found that some students thought that they would remember what they learned for longer because the work to produce a portfolio helped them internalise the material.…”
Section: Assessment Is Enjoyablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional view that the assessment of students' achievement is separate from instruction and only comes at the end of the learning process, is no longer tenable. As assessment, learning and instruction become more and more integrated, there is a strong support for representing assessment as a tool for learning (Dochy & McDowell, 1997;Sambell et al, 1997). In this respect, Birenbaum (1996) has made a useful distinction between two cultures in the measurement of achievement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En su estudio, Pajares (1992) confirmó que profundizar en las concepciones de la enseñanza es prioritario para la investigación en educación, ya que sólo si conocemos las concepciones podemos cambiar las prácticas del profesorado en el aula. En este sentido, conociendo las creencias implícitas podremos determinar las prácticas docentes y así trazar líneas para su mejora, fin último de cualquier investigación educativa (Brown, 2008;Opre, 2010;Pajares, 1992;Sambell, McDowell y Brown, 1997;Vandeyar y Killen, 2007).…”
Section: Las Investigaciones Sobre Concepciones De Evaluación Una Reunclassified