The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1108/gm-07-2019-0129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Busy female directors: an exploratory analysis of the impact of quotas and interest groups

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to provide an exploratory analysis of male and female directors, comparing the case of UK FTSE 350 boards of directors for 2010–2018, with Norwegian boards from 2002 to 2018, to examine patterns of busy female directors. This paper considers the differences between the effects of interest groups’ actions and those of quotas on the emergence of busy female directors. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a longitudinal approach, providing an examination of both non-busy directors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet even these diversity campaigns are rarely in favour of the implementation of quotas or hard legislation (Sarabi and Smith, 2021;, rather the argument for gender diversity is built around the business case (rather than the ethical consideration as observed in Norway).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet even these diversity campaigns are rarely in favour of the implementation of quotas or hard legislation (Sarabi and Smith, 2021;, rather the argument for gender diversity is built around the business case (rather than the ethical consideration as observed in Norway).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially the 30% club campaigned for the top 100 firms in the UK to have at least 30% female representation on its board of directors. In 2015, when this target was in sight, the group set two new objectives (Sarabi and Smith, 2021). Firstly, they expanded the 30% representation goal to the top 350 firms in the UK (the FTSE 350), moving beyond the top 100 (FTSE 100).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a limited pool of experienced female directors (golden skirts) Azmat and Boring (2020), Fitzsimmons (2012), Hwang et al (2020). Sarabi and Smith (2020) Create conflict due to diverse perspectives without seeing any benefits from them. Mandatory quotas are seen to be unfair and, as such, might affect cooperation within the board Ferreira (2011), Fitzsimmons (2012), Leszczy nska (2018)…”
Section: Reasons Given Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also highlight that England does not enforce extensive quotas or policies regarding the glass ceiling. Therefore, policies that require the implementation of quotas in companies' management boards have been one of the tools used by some countries as a means of achieving lower gender inequality levels (Sharif, 2015Reddy & Jadhav, 2019Sarabi & Smith, 2021). This phenomenon is becoming a trend of recent years in Europe as means to accelerate the gender equality process since the issue has not considerably advanced regarding positions of power and management, especially in private companies.…”
Section: Corporate and Public Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%