2021
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business orientation and sustainable development: A systematic review of sustainability orientation literature and future research avenues

Abstract: This study aims to systematically identify, review, and assess the progression of sustainability orientation literature and provide an agenda for future research. We employed a systematic literature review (SLR) technique to select a sample of 93 studies from five databases: Web of Sciences, Scopus, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, and Emerald Insight. The content analysis, aided by MaxQDA, was utilized for review and analysis purposes. The findings suggest that extant research on sustainability orientati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(160 reference statements)
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It assists with gathering every single related publication and document that fits our predefined inclusion criteria to respond to a particular research question. It utilizes unmistakable and systematic methodology to limit the event of bias during searching, identification, appraisal, synthesis, analysis and summary of studies (Antman et al, 1992) At point when the technique is done appropriately and has no significant mistake, the review can give reliable findings and reliable conclusion that could end up being useful to decision-makers and scientific practitioners to act accordingly (Antman et al, 1992;Khizar et al, 2021). The SLR is the fundamental procedure and it guarantees that the work is thoroughly arranged before the actual review work starts (Mengist et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It assists with gathering every single related publication and document that fits our predefined inclusion criteria to respond to a particular research question. It utilizes unmistakable and systematic methodology to limit the event of bias during searching, identification, appraisal, synthesis, analysis and summary of studies (Antman et al, 1992) At point when the technique is done appropriately and has no significant mistake, the review can give reliable findings and reliable conclusion that could end up being useful to decision-makers and scientific practitioners to act accordingly (Antman et al, 1992;Khizar et al, 2021). The SLR is the fundamental procedure and it guarantees that the work is thoroughly arranged before the actual review work starts (Mengist et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More broadly, there is a large set of review articles addressing different aspects of Sustainability but not touching on the SDGs specifically (e.g. Rathner, 2013, on Socially Responsible versus Conventional Investment Funds; Khizar et al, 2022, on the Conceptualization and Measurement Challenges of Sustainability Orientation; Lopez‐Torres et al, 2021, on Sustainability for Competitiveness for Firms; Carter & Easton, 2011, on Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Evolution and Future Directions; Khizar et al, 2021, on Business Orientation and Sustainable Development; Katz et al, 2022, on Employee Green Behavior: A Meta Analysis; Vysochan et al, 2021, on Sustainability Accounting; and Adhikariparajuli et al, 2021, on CSR Implications and Disclosure in Higher Education). These are just examples of relevant meta‐analysis reviews pertaining to Sustainability in general, highlighting some important angles being tackled in recent scholarship.…”
Section: The Role Of Scholarship On the Sdgs: More Pressing Than Evermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, recent studies have suggested that firms should adopt a mix of orientations in a dynamic and competitive environment (Hakala, 2011). Likewise, recent studies have demonstrated the significance to study the synergistic and interaction effects of multiple strategic orientations instead of focusing on investigating a single orientation in isolation (Ho et al, 2016; Khizar et al, 2021). In line with this, Hakala (2011) conducted a systematic meta-analytic review of multiple strategic orientations in management literature.…”
Section: Framework Development—entrepreneurial Responsible Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%