2014
DOI: 10.1002/sej.1190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business Model Evaluation: Quantifying Walmart's Sources of Advantage

Abstract: A B S T R A C TWe develop an analytical framework on the basis of the economics of business performance to provide quantitative insight into the link between a firm's business model choices and their profit consequences. The method is applied to Walmart by building a qualitative representation of its business model and mapping that representation on an analytical model that quantifies the company's sources of advantage over time. The analysis suggests that the effectiveness of a particular business model depen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
73
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This conceptual clarity can significantly improve the theoretical underpinnings of empirical business model research. Previous empirical studies conceptualize business model innovation very differently: for instance Bock et al () as management efforts in comparison to other innovation types, Hock et al (in press) as propensity to change the business model, and Brea‐Solís et al () as management choices and consequences. Therefore, the results of these studies can until now hardly be interpreted theoretically consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conceptual clarity can significantly improve the theoretical underpinnings of empirical business model research. Previous empirical studies conceptualize business model innovation very differently: for instance Bock et al () as management efforts in comparison to other innovation types, Hock et al (in press) as propensity to change the business model, and Brea‐Solís et al () as management choices and consequences. Therefore, the results of these studies can until now hardly be interpreted theoretically consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using proxies, case data, etc.) (e.g., Zott and Amit, ; Bock et al, ; Aspara et al, ; Brea‐Solís et al, ). Taking for example the effects of business model innovation on firm performance, no consistent effect could be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identified BM design components may be used for new ventures or established firms, as long as the critical success factors are taken into account e.g. ensuring actor participation in BM change, decoupling products, services and technologies from the business model, allowing for strategic flexibility and combinative capabilities, reducing structural complexity or managing outsourced / co-developed / co-partnered components of the BM (Adebanjo, 2010;Alt & Zimmermann, 2014;Bock et al, 2012;Dahan, Doh, Oetzel, & Yaziji, 2010;Fikirkoca & Saritas, 2012) and due attention is given to risks, BM implementation and organizational anchoring (Bertels et al, 2015;Bjorkdahl, 2009;Brea-Solis, Casadesus-Masanell, & Grifell-Tatje, 2015;Bucherer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Figure 10 -Types Of Results Obtained (Project Map Based On Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas this study does not assume that either positive or negative changes in knowledge investments are desired, future studies could use network DEA (Färe et al 2007) to treat knowledge investments as an intermediate product that is maximized or minimized according to the normative objectives. This approach could be integrated into the business model rationales of Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart (2011), who refer to network effects in virtuous circles that enhance competitive advantages, or of Brea-Solís et al (2015), who show that profit consequences are mainly driven by implementation (i.e. micro-level decision making).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another facet of this result could come from the firms' strategic behavior, as instead of straightforward catching up to the current period frontier, investments in R&D could be driven by strategic renewal, which generally has effects on the longer term not captured well by the used measures (Knott and Posen 2009). For these effects to be revealed, one would need to shift focus from industry benchmarking to internal measures for business model implementation (see, e.g., Brea-Solís et al 2015).…”
Section: Knowledge Investments and Performance Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 97%