Business at the margins? Business interests in edge urban politics

Abstract

The issue of the organization, role and influence of business interests in urban politics at the edge of major cities is one that is overdue for investigation. This article provides an initial and empirically oriented investigation of the organization, role and influence of business interests in edge urban politics in Europe. We present findings from five members of a European network of self-styled 'edge cities'. Following the now extensive debate in academic literature regarding the applicability of US concepts such as growth machines and urban regimes to the European setting, we draw attention to a diversity of business involvement in urban politics at the edge of Europe's capital cities. This diversity does include instances that, despite the very different 'macro-necessities' structuring edge urban politics in Europe, approximate to these concepts. Moreover, the diversity apparent in edge urban business politics raises several important questions for future research on urban governance. Namely, the complex connection between the local dependence of business and the organization of its interests; the 'jumping of scales' by locally dependent edge urban actors, and the sometimes neglected articulation of business interests with party political organization. Copyright (c) 2006 The Authors. Journal Compilation (c) 2006 Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Employment Decentralisation: Polycentricity or Scatteration? The Case of Barcelona

“…In the European case, several studies have analysed not only phenomena related to the scatteration of employment, but also the emergence of polycentric configurations in which sub-centres adapt to the new functions of the post-Fordist production system (Harding, 1997;van den Berg et al, 2001;Phelps and Parsons, 2003;Phelps, 2004;Phelps et al, 2006). The diversity of examples and their idiosyncrasies show the need to take into consideration pathdependency arguments.…”

Resource Exchange in Urban Governance

“…In the United States, however, business participation seems to be more dominant in the resolution of urban issues than in European continental cities (but see Phelps et al 2006), and, as such, urban regime theory seems inherently biased toward focusing on the private business and public actors participating in urban regimes. In the case of the New York City race riots discussed above, the lack of interactions with community organizations could be well explained by urban regime theory.…”

“…In principle, urban policy networks are more inclusive than the kinds of coalitions comprising urban regimes (cf., Pierre 2005). Yet, partnerships between political and business elites are still an important focus in studies of European urban governance (Le Galès and Harding 1998;Phelps et al 2006).…”

Ancrer le capital dans les flux logistiques : la financiarisation de l’immobilier logistique

“…Au contraire, l'immobilier logistique y échappe-t-il partiellement ? De plus, PHELPS montre que les territoires périurbains constituent un contexte favorable à l'émergence de coalitions de croissance ou de régimes urbains davantage que les villes centres (PHELPS et al, 2006 ;PHELPS et WOOD, 2011 ;PHELPS, 2012). Ces conclusions se rapprochent de celles des travaux mettant en évidence la montée en puissance d'un « urban privatism » (BARNEKOV et al, 1989) et, par conséquent, d'une « post-political » ou « post-democratic city » (SWYNGEDOUW, 2009MACLEOD, 2011) : des pans de plus en plus importants de l'action publique locale seraient privatisés et mis au service des intérêts des élites économiques par le truchement de différentes formes de partenariats publics privés, du remplacement progressif des gouvernements élus par des agences, de la fermeture et la sécession de certaines territoires urbains (GRAHAM et MARVIN, 2001 ; MACLEOD, 2011) et plus largement du consensus en faveur de la croissance économique (HARVEY, 1989).…”