Proceedings 19th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium. VTS 2001
DOI: 10.1109/vts.2001.923457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burn-in failures and local region yield: an integrated field-reliability model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10][11] NNR extends this relationship to continuous-valued measurements. Previous articles defined the NNR Î DDQ (x, y) as the median of at least eight dies closest to the (x, y) location.…”
Section: Nnr Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[8][9][10][11] NNR extends this relationship to continuous-valued measurements. Previous articles defined the NNR Î DDQ (x, y) as the median of at least eight dies closest to the (x, y) location.…”
Section: Nnr Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, several authors [18][19][20][21] developed yield-reliability models taking the time variable into consideration. Kim et al 19,20 and Kim et al 21 introduced the time variable into the yield-reliability model for describing the breakdown of gate oxide, a specific structure within a semiconductor device.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies did not consider such an explanatory variable as d and dealt with only a specific type of failure (i.e., gate oxide breakdown). On the other hand, Barnett and Singh 18 developed a general yieldreliability model that includes d as a parameter and considered the time variable without limiting the model to a specific type of failure. An advantage of their theoretical model is that it consists of parameters (e.g., average number of killer defects, degree of defect clustering, ratio of average number of latent defects to that of killer defects, etc.)…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation