2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burial and exhumation history of the Polish Outer Carpathians: Discriminating the role of thrusting and post-thrusting extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their age is com pa ra ble to the results of AHe stud ies from the Outer Carpathians (cf. Mazzoli et al, 2010;Andreucci et al, 2013) and this might sug gest that these crys tals were re-de pos ited and trans ported to the Carpathian Foredeep Ba sin from the eroded Outer Carpathian thrust sheets. The sec ond group of ap a tite crys tals is char ac ter ized by an age of 11.6 ± 1.5 Ma.…”
Section: Calcareous Nannoplanktonmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Their age is com pa ra ble to the results of AHe stud ies from the Outer Carpathians (cf. Mazzoli et al, 2010;Andreucci et al, 2013) and this might sug gest that these crys tals were re-de pos ited and trans ported to the Carpathian Foredeep Ba sin from the eroded Outer Carpathian thrust sheets. The sec ond group of ap a tite crys tals is char ac ter ized by an age of 11.6 ± 1.5 Ma.…”
Section: Calcareous Nannoplanktonmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The undeformed section resulting from the sequential restoration has then been deformed forward in time (from the Early Cretaceous to the present day) in order to validate our structural interpretation and define the structure of the eroded successions. Constraints on the maximum burial and exhumation history have been obtained by thermal modeling based on low‐temperature thermochronometric data (apatite fission track and apatite and zircon (U‐Th‐Sm)/He ages) including both new (Table ) and published data [ Anczkiewicz et al ., ; Andreucci et al ., ; Zattin et al ., , and reference therein].…”
Section: Structural Modelingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…AHe re sults from the sur face sam ple (~5 km SE of the Bystry area) points to 13.4 ±2.2 Ma as a cooling tem per a ture from ~60-50°C (Andreucci et al, 2013). About 10 km east of the Bystry area, the AFT cool ing age (cool ing from ~110°C) of the sur face CCPB sam ple close to the PKB is es ti mated at 12.0 ±1.7 Ma (Anczkiewicz et al, 2013).…”
Section: Fig 8 Bse Im Ages Of Tuffitementioning
confidence: 92%
“…How ever, it is im por tant to note that both re sults are based on sin gle sam ples (other sam ples from the sur veys are not located in the vi cin ity of the Bystry Stream area). Also AFT and AHe anal y sis of the flysch-like sed i ments are prob lem atic due to of ten low qual ity of the in put ma te rial (Andreucci et al, 2013).…”
Section: Fig 8 Bse Im Ages Of Tuffitementioning
confidence: 99%