Bürgerenergie in Deutschland

Radtke, Jörg

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-14626-9

Cited by 24 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 263 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Related to the previous point, we would like to highlight the question of gender equality. Previous research has shown that non-male people are underrepresented in local energy projects in general (Tsagkari 2022) and CE projects in particular (Radtke 2016). The early beginnings of CE development on AErø were no exception to this as the original group that started wind and solar projects consisted exclusively of men.…”

Section: Democratisation and Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Safe havens for energy democracy? Analysing the low-carbon transitions of Danish energy islands

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Denmark has long been known as a pioneer in renewable energy technology development. Apart from technological leadership, Denmark has also been the home to many community-based renewable energy initiatives. Citizen involvement in local energy projects has been key to increasing and maintaining acceptance to wind, solar and biomass. Three Danish islands (Bornholm, Samsø and Ærø) have been particularly active in promoting renewables. All three have claimed the title “energy island” and two of them have established specific institutions to promote further RE projects. In this article, we investigate community energy projects on two of the islands (Samsø and Ærø) through an Energy Democracy lens. The purpose of this investigation is to understand how the development on these islands relate to the concept of Energy Democracy: we outline how democratic processes and institutions shape the development of the local infrastructure and how this development, in turn, shaped local democracy. We found that many of the features of Energy Democracy were present in the two cases. Our research highlights a number of shortcomings of the concept of energy democracy, most importantly, a certain disregard for questions of energy justice and a blindness towards questions of scale.

show abstract

Section: Democratisation and Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Safe havens for energy democracy? Analysing the low-carbon transitions of Danish energy islands

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For individual participation in community energy access to information and knowledge about existing participation opportunities are in turn major drivers of participation [82]. But also additional prerequisites such as financial requirements (acquisition of shares) and the minimum duration of participation determine participation (sometimes indirectly) [82]. While all these factors play a role motives to join energy communities remain diverse [77].…”

Section: Local Conditions For Collective Empowerment In Recsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While all these factors play a role motives to join energy communities remain diverse [77]. In Germany for instance motives to join an energy community are in tendency less revenue driven and tend to be more ideational (e.g., contributing to the energy transition) for low-income groups and academics than compared to high income groups [82]. With respect to equality of chances, and equity Park (2012) acknowledges differences between communities and their capacity to get involved in renewable energies [70].…”

Section: Local Conditions For Collective Empowerment In Recsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Empowering Vulnerable Consumers to Join Renewable Energy Communities—Towards an Inclusive Design of the Clean Energy Package

Hanke

Lowitzsch

2020

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The unequal distribution of costs and benefits of the energy transition is a challenge for energy justice and energy policy. Although the empowerment of consumers to participate in renewable energy communities (RECs) has great potential for a just energy transition, vulnerable consumers remain underrepresented in RE projects. The recast of the European renewable energy directive obliges the European Member States to facilitate the participation of vulnerable consumers and support their inclusion in its “enabling framework” for prosumership. However, the type and specific design of corresponding measures remains unclear. Against this background this article investigates consumer empowerment in a vulnerability context. In particular we stress the need to understand how vulnerability affects participation in RECs to inform both policy makers and practitioners on its specificities and restrictions for the “enabling framework”. To prevent the inclusion of vulnerable consumers in RECs from remaining an idea on paper lawmakers need to be made aware of the implications for a consistent “enabling framework”. We argue that both individual vulnerable consumers as well as RECs need incentives and support to boost RECs’ capacity to include groups that until now remain underrepresented.

show abstract

“…Jedoch nur knapp 14% des Jahresumsatzes an pflanzlichen Arzneimitteln in Deutschland im Jahr 2020 (ca. 1,4 Milliarden €) basierten auf einer ärztlichen Verordnung 4 . Dies verdeutlicht, wie wichtig es ist, die vorhandene Evidenz zu Phytotherapie systematisch aufzuarbeiten und adäquate Empfehlungen in medizinische Leitlinien zu integrieren.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Phytotherapie bei psychischen Erkrankungen in medizinischen Leitlinien

Bittel

Rakoczy

Fröhlich

et al. 2022

Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Phytotherapeutika werden aufgrund ihrer Beliebtheit bei PatientInnen und ihrer langen traditionellen Verwendung zunehmend in medizinische Leitlinien aufgenommen. Methode Die vorliegende Übersichtsarbeit gibt einen systematischen Überblick über phytotherapeutische Empfehlungen und Inhalte in deutschen (AWMF) und internationalen (WFSBP, CANMAT) medizinischen Leitlinien für psychische Erkrankungen. Ergebnisse Phytotherapeutika können bei leichten bis mittelschweren psychischen Störungen wie folgt empfohlen werden: Depressionen [(+++): Johanniskraut (Hypericum perforatum L.), (++ ): Safran (Crocus sativus L.) und Curcuma (Curcuma longa L.), (+): Lavendel (Lavandula angustifolia Mill.) und (+/–): Rosenwurz (Rhodiola rosea L.)], Angststörungen [(++ ): Lavendel und Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal), (+): Galphimia (Galphimia glauca Cav.), (+/–): Kamille (Matricaria spp.); „nicht empfohlen“ (–) wird Kava-Kava (Piper methysticum G. Forst.) wegen möglicher Lebertoxizität], Schlafstörungen [(+/–): Baldrian (Valeriana officinalis L.)] und Demenz [(+++): Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.) zur Verbesserung der Kognition]. Sicherheit und Verträglichkeit wurden überwiegend als sehr gut bis tolerabel bewertet. Schlussfolgerung Internationale Leitlinien zeigen die mögliche Vielfalt an empfehlenswerten Phytotherapeutika für die Behandlung von psychischen Erkrankungen auf. Die derzeitige Überarbeitung einer Vielzahl nationaler Leitlinien zu psychischen Erkrankungen bietet die Chance, bestehende Empfehlungen für Phytotherapeutika systematisch zu aktualisieren und neue zu integrieren, um TherapeutInnen eine evidenzbasierte Nutzen-Risiko-Bewertung für ihre PatientInnen zu ermöglichen.

show abstract

Bürgerenergie in Deutschland

Cited by 24 publications

References 263 publications

Safe havens for energy democracy? Analysing the low-carbon transitions of Danish energy islands

Safe havens for energy democracy? Analysing the low-carbon transitions of Danish energy islands

Empowering Vulnerable Consumers to Join Renewable Energy Communities—Towards an Inclusive Design of the Clean Energy Package

Phytotherapie bei psychischen Erkrankungen in medizinischen Leitlinien

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About