1998
DOI: 10.2307/977575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bureaucratic Theory Meets Reality: Public Choice and Service Contracting in U. S. Local Government

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
247
0
15

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
247
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The first studies were inspired by public choice theory. According to this theory, monopolization of services will result in overproduction and inefficiencies, whereas contracting out will lead to lower spending (Boyne 1998). There has been some empirical evidence for these hypotheses; for example, for Italian local utilities where (partial) privatization has been shown to (significantly) decrease total costs (Garrone et al 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Municipalities' Choices Of Service Delmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first studies were inspired by public choice theory. According to this theory, monopolization of services will result in overproduction and inefficiencies, whereas contracting out will lead to lower spending (Boyne 1998). There has been some empirical evidence for these hypotheses; for example, for Italian local utilities where (partial) privatization has been shown to (significantly) decrease total costs (Garrone et al 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Municipalities' Choices Of Service Delmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9) Sobre este extremo puede consultarse Boyne (1998) Si bien el tamaño municipal (11) constituye un indicador indirecto de la capacidad de la administración local, la riqueza o posición de mercado del municipio (12), podría ser también un factor con capacidad para explicar diferencias en el modelo de desarrollo urbano, pues se considera que municipios caracterizados por un mayor desarrollo económico centrarían sus esfuerzos en promover dicho desarrollo, mientras que municipios con menor renta atenderían al bienestar social de la ciudadanía.…”
Section: El Contexto De La Iniciativa Del Marco Institucional a Las unclassified
“…Esta pesquisa apresenta esses argumentos por causa de sua longevidade, embora note que essa perspectiva é desafiada (BOZEMAN, 2007) e que as provas sobre o impacto da privatização e contratação são fracas (BOYNE, 1998;HODGE, 2000;LELAND & SMIRNOVA, 2009). …”
Section: Propriedadeunclassified