2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3505848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bureaucratic Competence and Procurement Outcomes

Abstract: and the participants at seminars where preliminary versions of this study were presented. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The persistency of the competence measures is evident for the case of the four agencies shown in Figure 3. An in depth analysis of this aspect is presented in an earlier NBER WP Decarolis et al [2018]. An alternative strategy exploiting long run changes is described when introducing the robustness checks.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The persistency of the competence measures is evident for the case of the four agencies shown in Figure 3. An in depth analysis of this aspect is presented in an earlier NBER WP Decarolis et al [2018]. An alternative strategy exploiting long run changes is described when introducing the robustness checks.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where more comprehensive data are available and used, often the auction mechanism is non-standard (see Ferraz et al 2016 for Brazil and Lee 2017 for Korea), or the data are limited in other ways, such as lacking information on all the bids (e.g. Decarolis et al 2018 for the US). The richest data (aside ours) concern Lithuania (Baltrunaite 2018) and Russia (Best et al 2018 andVitalijs 2017), but even in those, and in all the large data sets we are aware of, information on (or a good proxy for) potential bidders is missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that passive waste accounts for 83% of the total waste of spending on public services. Recent studies (Coviello and Gagliarducci, 2017; Best et al , 2017; Decarolis et al , 2018) stress the importance of bureaucratic characteristics in accounting for passive waste such as the level of cooperation within the office, office tenure and level of effectiveness. Two implications are immediate.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%