2018
DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_196_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burden of orofacial clefting in India, 2016: A global burden of disease approach

Abstract: Background:In the recent past, there have been inconsistent reports of India witnessing a decreasing trend in the incidence of orofacial clefts (OFC). To date, little comprehensive evidence has been published. To identify the prevalence, associated burden in terms of epidemiological parameters and to estimate the “unmet” OFC treatment needs, the present study was undertaken.Materials and Methods:Using the Global Burden of Diseases 2016 approach and its assumptions, an attempt was made to estimate the prevalenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CLP is a major public health problem affecting 1.47 in thousand live births globally, and in India, the estimated incidence is around 0.25 to 2.29 per 1000 births [ 1 ]. In India, the calculated prevalence rate/100,000 was 33.27 for males and 31.01 for females [ 1 - 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CLP is a major public health problem affecting 1.47 in thousand live births globally, and in India, the estimated incidence is around 0.25 to 2.29 per 1000 births [ 1 ]. In India, the calculated prevalence rate/100,000 was 33.27 for males and 31.01 for females [ 1 - 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing countries where prenatal care is less advanced, a CL/P is usually unpredicted and families have faith in religion and folklore than medical explanations to explain the deformity. For instance, individuals in India who practice Hinduism believe that a CL/P is the result of sins from a past life [ 2 ]. Other religious and cultural beliefs regarding the causation of clefts include witchcraft, God’s will, and engaging in behavior associated with causal power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,7 The discrepancy between estimates and actual global burden values in LMICs have been attributed to numerous factors, including the absence of genetic testing (OR = 1.22, 95% CI [1.22, 1.22]), undiagnosed CLPs in stillbirths (OR = 1.22 95% CI [1.22, 1.22]), underreporting (OR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.88, 1.00]), and non-recording (OR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.15, 6.63]). 1 In addition, LMIC plastic surgery researchers face multiple barriers, including a lack of training, funding, and institutional support. 19 The shortage of high-quality research on CLP in LMIC populations hinders the development of contextualized patient management guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-Syndromic Cleft Lip and Palate (NSCL/P) is the world's second most prevalent congenital birth defect, with incidence of 1 in 700 live births and varies by ethnicity or geographical region. Balaji et al , reported a prevalence of NSCL/P 1.3 in 1000 live births in India 1 . Since patients of NSCL/P suffer with problems of feeding, speech difficulties, malnutrition, hearing injuries, infections and mental disorders from birth to adulthood, they need multidisciplinary care like surgical or dental treatment, speech therapy and psychosocial interventions throughout life 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%