2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-012-1782-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bullying and victimization among Turkish children and adolescents: examining prevalence and associated health symptoms

Abstract: These findings contribute to a better understanding of bullying in Turkish schools, emphasizing the negative effects of bullying involvement on health and well-being.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the current research was also consistent with that done in Romania (Belden-Galea et al, 2010) and Turkey (Arslan et al, 2012;Tayli, 2013) that argued the incidence of victimization was higher than that of perpetration. Psychology…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the current research was also consistent with that done in Romania (Belden-Galea et al, 2010) and Turkey (Arslan et al, 2012;Tayli, 2013) that argued the incidence of victimization was higher than that of perpetration. Psychology…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For example, in one study in Romania which used self-reports, it was found out that 40.5% of 264 students surveyed indicated that they were victims of school bullying and only 33.8% admitted that they had bullied others (Belden-Galea, Jurcau, & Tigan, 2010). The same was true for sampled students in Turkey (Arslan, Hallett, Akkas, & Akkas, 2012;Tayli, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…There is evidence that a lack of connectedness plays a major role in young people's risky health behaviors such as substance use (Peltzer, 2009), smoking (Rasmussen, Damsgaard, Holstein, Poulsen, & Due, 2005), and weapon violence (Henrich, Brookmeyer, & Shahar, 2005). A similar link has been found between traditional bullying perpetration and school connectedness (Arslan et al, 2012;Cunningham, 2007). Yet, to date, there seems no research examining the association between school connectedness and cyberbullying perpetration.…”
Section: School Connectednessmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Compared to the victims, traditional bullies were reported having low levels of school attendance, school satisfaction and higher levels of irritability (Arslan, Hallett, Akkas, & Akkas, 2012); and in comparison with the non-involved students, cyberbullies were found to have social problems, higher levels of stress, depression and anxiety (Campbell, Slee, Spears, Butler, & Kift, 2013). When compared with the non-involved students, perpetrators of traditional bullying and cyberbullying were also at highest risk in terms of substance usage and weapon carrying (Wang, Iannotti, & Luk, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Şiddet nedenleri; failleri ve yöneldiği kesimler ile türü açısından çok boyutlu olup niteliği, görünümü ve algısı giderek değişmektedir. Şiddeti sadece fiziksel boyutuyla algılama eğilimi yaygın olsa da sözel, duygusal, ekonomik ve cinsel boyutları da bulunmaktadır [1,2] Okulda şiddet kavramı yeni olmamakla birlikte son yıllarda artış göstermektedir. Gerek yapılan çalışmalarda gerekse kitle iletişim araçlarında okuldaki şiddet olaylarına ilişkin haberlerin sayısında ciddi bir artış söz konusudur [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified