2014
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bullous Pemphigoid Autoantibodies Directly Induce Blister Formation without Complement Activation

Abstract: Complement activation and subsequent recruitment of inflammatory cells at the dermal/epidermal junction are thought to be essential for blister formation in bullous pemphigoid (BP), an autoimmune blistering disease induced by autoantibodies against type XVII collagen (COL17); however, this theory does not fully explain the pathological features of BP. Recently, the involvement of complement-independent pathways has been proposed. To directly address the question of the necessity of the complement activation in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
108
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(84 reference statements)
5
108
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…BP is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease caused by IgG autoantibodies targeting the noncollagenous 16A (NC16A) domain of human collagen 17 21, 22 . Previous studies using a passive transfer mouse model demonstrated that these autoantibodies mediated the pathogenic mechanisms of BP, including autoantibody binding, complement fixation and activation, immune cell infiltration, proteinase secretion, and subepidermal blister formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BP is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease caused by IgG autoantibodies targeting the noncollagenous 16A (NC16A) domain of human collagen 17 21, 22 . Previous studies using a passive transfer mouse model demonstrated that these autoantibodies mediated the pathogenic mechanisms of BP, including autoantibody binding, complement fixation and activation, immune cell infiltration, proteinase secretion, and subepidermal blister formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following antibodies were used: anti-E-cadherin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA; 24E10, RRID: AB_10694492), anti-phospho histone H3 (Ser10) (Merck Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA, RRID: AB_11210699), anti-PCNA (Dako, Santa Clara, California, USA; PC10, RRID: AB_2160651), anti-BrdU (Dako; M0744, RRID:AB_10013660), anti-loricrin (Covance, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, RRID:AB_10064155), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, RRID:AB_2341188), FITC-conjugated anti-CD3e (BioLegend, San Diego, California; 145–2 C11, RRID:AB_394595), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-F4/80 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, California, USA; BM8, RRID: AB_893479), FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate)-conjugated anti-Ly-6G (Beckman coulter, Brea, California, USA; RB6-8C5,RRID: AB_394643), anti-TGFβ1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, USA, RRID: AB_632486), anti-p-Smad2 (Cell Signaling Technology; 138D4, RRID:AB_490941), anti-LEF1 (Cell Signaling Technology; C12A5, RRID: AB_823558), anti-β-catenin (BD; 14/Beta-catenin, RRID: AB_397554), anti-hCOL17 NC16A domain (TS39-3, homemade) (Ujiie et al, 2014), anti-extracellular portion of hCOL17 (mAb233, homemade) (Nishizawa et al, 1993), anti-murine COL17 NC14A domain (MoNC14A, homemade) (Nishie et al, 2015), anti-cytoplasmic portion of COL17 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; ab186415, 1A8c, homemade (Nishizawa et al, 1993)), anti-plectin (Abcam; ab32528, RRID: AB_777339), anti-BP230 (Cosmo bio, Tokyo, Japan; 239, RRID:AB_1961833), anti-desmogleins 1 and 2 (PROGEN, Wieblingen, Heidelberg, Germany; DG3.10, RRID: AB_1284107), anti-integrin β1 (Chemicon International, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA; MB1.2, RRID: AB_2128202), anti-integrin α6 (BD Pharmingen; GoH3, RRID: AB_2296273), anti-ELANE (Abcam), anti-phospho aPKC (Santa Cruz; sc-271962, RRID:AB_10708397), and anti-survivin (Cell Signaling Technology; 71G4B7, RRID:AB_10691694), anti-laminin β1 (Abcam; LT3, RRID: AB_775971). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IgG1 is more prevalent in patients at the early stage of BP than IgG4, but IgG4 increases in patients with chronic BP. Ujiie et al reported that autoantibodies to BP induced blister formation in the absence of complement activation and that IgG4 was predominantly elevated and associated with the induction of blister formation in BP [17]. Our patient developed MN secondarily to blister formation during the chronic stage of BP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%