Bulk Surveillance in the Digital Age: Rethinking the Human Rights Law Approach to Bulk Monitoring of Communications Data

Abstract

The digital age has brought new possibilities and potency to state surveillance activities. Of significance has been the advent of bulk communications data monitoring, which involves the large-scale collection, retention and subsequent analysis of communications data. The scale and invasiveness of these techniques generate key questions regarding their ‘necessity’ from a human rights law perspective and they are the subject of ongoing human rights-based litigation. This article examines bulk communications data surveillance through the lens of human rights law, undertaking critical examination of both the potential utility of bulk communications surveillance and – drawing on social science analysis – the potential human rights-related harm. It argues that utility and harm calculations can conceal the complex nature of contemporary digital surveillance practices, rendering current approaches to the ‘necessity’ test problematic. The article argues that (i) the distinction between content and communications data be removed; (ii) analysis of surveillance-related harm must extend beyond privacy implications and incorporate society-wide effects; and (iii) a more nuanced approach to bulk communications data be developed. Suggestions are provided as to how the ‘necessity’ of bulk surveillance measures may be evaluated, with an emphasis on understanding the type of activity that may qualify as ‘serious crime’.

Digitizing Sociology: Continuity and Change in the Internet Era

“…As Amoore (2013: 17) points out, such advances have allowed digitally derived norms and the boundaries of categorizations to become ‘hyper-mobile’. The speed and dynamism of digital categorization not only generates problems concerning the fidelity and fairness of these classifications but also affects their decipherability and, hence, accountability (see Murray and Fussey, 2019).…”

Perspectives from Higher Education: Applied Sciences University Teachers on the Digitalization of the Bioeconomy : The Acceptance of Digital Surveillance in an Age of Big Data

“…This can happen, for example, by blocking their ability to travel due to having a lower reputation rating and trustworthiness score on state-wide "social credit systems". Thus, consideration of harms that may arise due to mass surveillance by states and corporations should extend beyond mere privacy issues and incorporate a large variety of society-wide effects (Murray & Fussay, 2019).…”

Legal aspects related to digital twin

“…Next, we will need to review the letter of the law as it currently stands. Some are calling for the establishment of new fundamental rights, called ‘meta-rights’ [14,15]: the right to be forgotten, the right to disobey or the right to be informed. The ability to forget and be forgotten, to disobey, or to be informed about the reasons for our actions are all seen today as essential for a solid legal system; in other words, a legal system that is effective when faced with algorithmic governmentality and the new norms that it creates.…”