2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building trust: Heart rate synchrony and arousal during joint action increased by public goods game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same vein, Mitkidis et al. [19] showed that high degrees of heart-rate synchrony in an unrelated joint task was predictive of high mutual trust, expressed in terms of a public goods game.…”
Section: Two Challenges Appear When Aiming To Measure and Analyze Teamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the same vein, Mitkidis et al. [19] showed that high degrees of heart-rate synchrony in an unrelated joint task was predictive of high mutual trust, expressed in terms of a public goods game.…”
Section: Two Challenges Appear When Aiming To Measure and Analyze Teamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Early work focused on how similarity between patients' and therapists' heart rates mapped onto behavioral processes such as rapport and antagonism (Coleman, Greenblatt, & Soloman, 1956;DiMascio, Boyd, & Greenblatt, 1957). Since that time, physiological influence has been used to study romantic couples, parent-child dyads, and newly-acquainted dyads and teams, and influence has been associated with relationship quality, individual differences like attachment, and the development of self-regulation and trust (Hill-Soderlund et al, 2008;Levenson & Gottman, 1983;Mitkidis, McGraw, Roepstorff, & Wallot, 2015;Suveg, Shaffer, & Davis, 2016; for reviews see Timmons, Margolin, & Saxbe, 2015;Palumbo et al, 2016).A primary strength of studying physiological influence in interpersonal encounters is that it allows scholars to test theoretical questions that are not testable using traditional measures of self-report or behavioral recordings alone. For example, physiological measures can provide continuous information about participants' emotional states-including those that are outside of awareness and may not be readily observable (Blascovich & Mendes, 2010); they are also not subject to the same demand effects that can bias self-reported data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured 30 subjects\u2019 affec-tive response to vibrations varying in rhythm and frequency, then examined how differences in demographic, everyday use of touch, and tactile processing abilities contribute to variations in affective response. To this end, we developed five affective and sensory rat-ing scales and two tactile performance tasks, and also employed a published \ u2018Need for Touch\u2019 (NFT, LEGOS [16]). The remaining 30.43 % (14) corresponded to studies in the field of emotion simulation [17][18][19][20], the development and adaptation of tools for measuring emotions [21], literature revisions and editorials [6,14,[22][23][24], and the interaction of the individual with their environment and other individuals [25][26][27][28] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search was carried out in the databases previously mentioned and, as a result, the following number of papers was obtained: ScienceDirect (14), IEEEXplorer (162), SCOPUS (144), EngineeringVillage (125), ISI Web of knowledge (291), ACM (7), EMBASE (16), and PubMed (13). Given that we were looking for studies that used video games as emotion stimulation tools, the previously search was complemented including the word "games" in any section of the article.…”
Section: B Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation