2005
DOI: 10.1002/tqem.20078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building the resilient firm: The new challenge to EHS organizations

Abstract: A number of recent events have created a new challenge for the environmental, health, and safety tacks, disasters, and disease outbreaks. If the conditions that led to the recent increases in terrorism, new diseases, and disaster costs were temporary, such immediate organizational and Environmental Quality Management / Winter 2005 / 27

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also suggested that resilient organisations should build planning teams typically including members from all functional areas as well as suppliers and key outsourcing providers to manage vulnerabilities in turbulent times (Tompkins 2007). In resilience terms, these findings are in direct contrast to the characteristics of resilient organisations where a key feature of resilience is that any change should be proactive against a well thought out and prepared plan (Doe 1994, Bell 2002, Hamel and Valikangas 2003, Allenby and Roitz 2005, Sheffi 2005, Seville et al 2006, de Vries and Shields 2009. It therefore appears that what SME managers do to manage change is serving to undermine their resilience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It is also suggested that resilient organisations should build planning teams typically including members from all functional areas as well as suppliers and key outsourcing providers to manage vulnerabilities in turbulent times (Tompkins 2007). In resilience terms, these findings are in direct contrast to the characteristics of resilient organisations where a key feature of resilience is that any change should be proactive against a well thought out and prepared plan (Doe 1994, Bell 2002, Hamel and Valikangas 2003, Allenby and Roitz 2005, Sheffi 2005, Seville et al 2006, de Vries and Shields 2009. It therefore appears that what SME managers do to manage change is serving to undermine their resilience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Impacts of weather extremes can lead to large-scale disasters if organizations across sectors and related communities incur physical damage, losses and/or disruption of their routine functioning and are unable to cope with the event effectively (Kreps, 1984). Recent weather extremes such as the 2011 Queensland floods, the 2010 floods in China and Pakistan, the 2010 drought and wildfires in Russia, the 2009 Victorian Bushfires or hurricanes Ike andKatrina in 2008 and2005, respectively, have focused attention on the human and economic costs of weatherrelated disasters and on the challenge for organizations to deal with their impact (Allenby & Roitz, 2005). The 2010 Russian drought and wildfires, for instance, wiped out significant parts of Russia's grain production; the corresponding grain shortage and temporary export ban had an impact on international wheat prices.…”
Section: E Xtreme Weather Events Can Create Significant Abrupt Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of resources, such as the protection of personnel, a decentralized workforce, the physical dispersion of assets and back-up facilities for data, can make organizations less sensitive to the localized impact of an external discontinuity (Allenby & Fink, 2005;Allenby & Roitz, 2005). For instance, researchers have suggested that the sensitivity of the European energy distribution sector to extreme weather events (such as the European heat wave in 2003) could be reduced by enhancing the interconnectedness of the distribution network and by introducing more local micro-grids (Arnell et al, 2005).…”
Section: Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research findings suggest that certain structural characteristics of organizations-for example, the physical dispersion of assets or a decentralized workforce-make them less sensitive to the impact of external discontinuities (Allenby & Fink, 2005;Allenby & Roitz, 2005). Such structural characteristics have received much attention in the domain of computer and IT system analysis (e.g., Najjar & Gaudiot, 1990), where researchers have studied the resilience of networks (defined as the ability of a network to provide and maintain an acceptable level of availability and service in the face of faults and disruptions to normal operations).…”
Section: Collapse: Avoiding and Minimizing Effects From Extreme Weather Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%