Building Robust Housing Sector Policy Using the Ecological Footprint

Abstract

Abstract:The vulnerability of the urban residential sector is likely to increase without the mitigation of growing household Ecological Footprints (energy demand, CO 2 emissions, and demand for land). Analysis comparing the effectiveness and robustness of policy to mitigate the size of the housing Ecological Footprint has been limited. Here, we investigate three mitigation options: (1) reducing housing floor area, (2) improving the building envelope efficiency, and (3) reducing the carbon intensity of the electricity sector. We model the urban residential Ecological Footprint for a sub-national case study in Australia but analyse the results in the global context. We find that all three mitigation options reduce the Ecological Footprint. The success of policy to reduce household energy demand and land requirements is somewhat dependent on uncertain trajectories of future global population, affluence, and technological progress (together, global uncertainty). Carbon emissions reductions, however, are robust to such global uncertainty. By reducing the Ecological Footprint of the urban residential housing sector we see a reduction in its vulnerability to future global uncertainty, global carbon price, urban sprawl, and future energy shortages. Over the long term, such policy implementation can also be highly cost effective. Keywords

A Theoretical Framework for Bolstering Human-Nature Connections and Urban Resilience via Green Infrastructure

“…In addition to summarizing the breadth of research that underpins the proposition of this article that an integrated model of the URT and the HNCT can help urban centers to respond to the challenges of climate change and declining human health, Tables A1-A3 also provide evidence that supports the global applicability of that proposition. From the outset, this project was structured to avoid a Euro or Western centric filter, which was aided by the scholarship regarding urban centers reporting the globalization of Western approaches to urban development for creating cities to accommodate increasingly urbanized human populations [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], (Tables A1-A3).…”

“…Application of the teachings and direction of URT in this context supports the implementation of renewable energy sources in conjunction with new technology that proves successful in reducing emissions. Carbon emissions, a large proportion of the waste from traditional energy production, negatively impacts human health in urban centers in directly through the effects of climate change and directly through exposure to atmospheric contaminants [44,45]. Regarding the direct exposure to atmospheric contaminants, energy related emissions reducing air quality precipitates an estimated 3.4 million pre-mature deaths, globally, each year [78] from disease mechanisms linked to adverse respiratory health conditions and cancers [46,47].…”

An Assessment of Long-Term Climate Change on Building Energy in Indonesia

“…Urbanisation and the rapidly increasing number of residential buildings in Indonesia (69,439 buildings in 2020) is a substantial contributor to human forced global heating [5]. In 2021, total direct and indirect emissions from the building sector was estimated at 13.6 Gt CO 2 , representing around 37% of global carbon emissions and 34% of final energy demand [6]. The Global Buildings Performance Network (GBPN) is working to tackle climate change, and they report that the building sector is responsible for 35% of the world's total energy consumption, where 55% of all electricity consumption is due to building operations, which contributes nearly 40% of global carbon emissions [7].…”