2016
DOI: 10.20965/jdr.2016.p0535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Private Sector Resilience: Directions After the 2015 Sendai Framework

Abstract: During recent mega-disasters, such as the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and the 2011 Thailand floods, interdependencies in supply chains caused substantial economic damage, often exacerbated by vulnerable small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Therefore, a new global framework in disaster risk reduction, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, mentions the role of the private sector in achieving a resilient society. However, the framework’s statements are abstract and they need to be conve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, their contribution examines the business resilience strategy in the context of the supply chain which can be divided into three overarching domains: anticipation (e.g., capability, distribution management and strategy formation, planning and design, and properties), resistance (e.g., supply chain reengineering, collaboration, agility, and supply chain risk management culture) and recovery-response actions (e.g., recovery preparation, long-term impacts). Haraguchi et al [55] set forth a business continuity management model based on public-private partnerships to face EWEs. According to this model, business resilience is classified into four levels: firm level resilience, supply chain resilience, public-private level resilience, and societal resilience.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, their contribution examines the business resilience strategy in the context of the supply chain which can be divided into three overarching domains: anticipation (e.g., capability, distribution management and strategy formation, planning and design, and properties), resistance (e.g., supply chain reengineering, collaboration, agility, and supply chain risk management culture) and recovery-response actions (e.g., recovery preparation, long-term impacts). Haraguchi et al [55] set forth a business continuity management model based on public-private partnerships to face EWEs. According to this model, business resilience is classified into four levels: firm level resilience, supply chain resilience, public-private level resilience, and societal resilience.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the interconnectedness of society makes it challenging for municipal governments to form GCPs. As lifelines and supply chains are interconnected (Haraguchi et al , 2016; Haraguchi and Kim, 2016) continuity of operations and businesses of other stakeholders will also affect the continuity of municipal governments' operations. Therefore, forming a GCP consistent with the business continuity plans (BCPs) of other stakeholders is vital (Haraguchi et al , 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As lifelines and supply chains are interconnected (Haraguchi et al , 2016; Haraguchi and Kim, 2016) continuity of operations and businesses of other stakeholders will also affect the continuity of municipal governments' operations. Therefore, forming a GCP consistent with the business continuity plans (BCPs) of other stakeholders is vital (Haraguchi et al , 2016). More broadly, a GCP needs to incorporate a rich set of area BCPs, public–private partnership (PPP) BCPs and community-based BCPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wedawatta et al (2010) and [194,207] develop their analysis in SMEs, but they do not generate frameworks for increasing and linking performance management in their supply chains. [49,208,209] require social mechanisms and government support to increase their growth and consolidation in the market. Economic and innovation policies in the countries provide a favorable environment for the strengthening of SMEs and their recovery from a possible disruptive event.…”
Section: Further Research Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%