2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-4580.2004.00009.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Power in the New Economy: The South Bay Labor Council

Abstract: Confronted with the technological changes and corporate restructuring that is eroding job security for all workers, the once booming economy of Silicon Valley is now undergoing severe growing pains. Moreover, the much vaunted information technology industry is producing a dual economy of high‐wage and low‐wage jobs. Now, with the bursting of the dot.com industry, workers in all sectors are confronting layoffs and lower expectations. In both boom and bust periods, the South Bay American Federation of Labor‐Cong… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(3 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once regarded as weak bodies (Eimer 2001 and Kriesky 2001: 132–3), central labour councils (CLCs) in the United States have been vital in attempts to build ‘grassroots power’ (Hurd et al . 2003: 102–3) — albeit with AFL‐CIO sponsorship — through specific campaigns, coalition building (Reynolds and Ness 2004) and ‘union city’ campaigns (Byrd and Rhee 2004; Kriesky 2001; Luce and Nelson 2004; Rhee and Sadler 2007). In some accounts, CLC renewal and the coalition‐building appear to be synonymous because, when CLCs reinvent themselves, they do so precisely by building linkages with ‘nonlabor community organizations’ (Gapasin and Wial 1998: 60).…”
Section: Understanding Peak Unionismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once regarded as weak bodies (Eimer 2001 and Kriesky 2001: 132–3), central labour councils (CLCs) in the United States have been vital in attempts to build ‘grassroots power’ (Hurd et al . 2003: 102–3) — albeit with AFL‐CIO sponsorship — through specific campaigns, coalition building (Reynolds and Ness 2004) and ‘union city’ campaigns (Byrd and Rhee 2004; Kriesky 2001; Luce and Nelson 2004; Rhee and Sadler 2007). In some accounts, CLC renewal and the coalition‐building appear to be synonymous because, when CLCs reinvent themselves, they do so precisely by building linkages with ‘nonlabor community organizations’ (Gapasin and Wial 1998: 60).…”
Section: Understanding Peak Unionismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, union relationships with peak councils or other unions may support collaboration by creating a culture of alliances that supports individual union engagement (Ellem and Shields 2004;. Central labor councils in the United States can be agents for change; for example, the AFL-CIO's Union Cities program supported coalition practice (Ness and Eimer 2001;Byrd and Rhee 2004;Luce and Nelson 2004;Reynolds 2004b). Similarly, community collaboration requires available community allies (Tarrow 1994).…”
Section: Opportunities For Coalition Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, research on the AFL–CIO has presented case studies of high‐performing CLCs and state federations that highlight their strategic value for the revitalization of the labour movement (Bielski Boris ; Bielski Boris and Wright ; Byrd and Rhee ; Dean and Reynolds ; Frank and Wong ; Grabelsky ; Karson , ; Luce and Nelson ; Ness ; Reynolds , ; Simmons and Luce ). While these case studies chronicle the work of central labour organizations in the United States, a deeper analysis of the factors driving this work has not been undertaken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%