“…[26] X-ray analyses X-ray crystallographic analysish as been successful for RuL1 and RuL4Ru,c onfirming both the proposed structure and stereochemistry about the azo moiety ( Figure 1). In both molecules, the Ru-porphyrin features slightly distorted, six-coordinate octahedralg eometry.T he carbon and nitrogen framework of porphyrin ring is essentiallyp lanar in both cases, and the mean deviations from the least-squares planes( porphyrin-N,N,N,N-plane) fall within the range of À0.106 (9) to 0.078 7for RuL1 and À0.220 (5) to 0.039(4) for RuL4Ru.T he Ru atom is situated above this plane by 0.061(2) and 0.0718 (10) for RuL1 and RuL4Ru,r espectively.T he axial pyridyl ligandsa re close to perpendicular to the porphyrin rings with N(py)-Ru-N(pyrrole) angles ranging from 87.61 (16) to 88.74 (16)8 for RuL1 and8 6.12(8)8 to 89.31(8)8 for RuL4Ru.F urthermore, the N(py)-Ru-C(CO) angles of RuL1 and RuL4Ru are nearly linear at 177.6(2) and 179.22(11)8,r espectively.W ith respectt ot he ligand,t he dihedrala ngle between the pyridyl and the phenylene ring of trans-L1 is only 13.9(2)8,w hile the two pyridyl rings of trans-L4 are coplanar (as determined by planes generated from the six atoms of the aryl groups of the linkers). Finally,t he solid-state structuresh ighlightt hat the presence of the CO ligand complicates the use of Ru-porphyrins as part of a platform strategy,a lthough the photochemical removal of the CO group is possible (see below).…”