2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building energy performance analysis: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observing the percentage of energy savings in Table 8, it is possible to notice that the declared savings by the designer after the retrofit and the achievable energy savings obtained by means of the dynamic model are not far and the differences can be related to the different adopted simulation codes. The declared energy savings were obtained by means of steady-state simulation tools, less accurate than the dynamic one, yet able to fully reproduce hourly environmental boundary conditions and consider structural inertial effects [43]. These percentage differences can be also ascribed, to a lesser extent, to the modified weather conditions, which play an important role for calculating buildings energy demands.…”
Section: Energy Performance Analysis Of the Reference Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observing the percentage of energy savings in Table 8, it is possible to notice that the declared savings by the designer after the retrofit and the achievable energy savings obtained by means of the dynamic model are not far and the differences can be related to the different adopted simulation codes. The declared energy savings were obtained by means of steady-state simulation tools, less accurate than the dynamic one, yet able to fully reproduce hourly environmental boundary conditions and consider structural inertial effects [43]. These percentage differences can be also ascribed, to a lesser extent, to the modified weather conditions, which play an important role for calculating buildings energy demands.…”
Section: Energy Performance Analysis Of the Reference Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deciding which building properties to select depends on the direct observation of the site [68][69][70][71][72], while the inside temperature of indoor spaces is set to 299 K [73].…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…θ i, nε temperature of the internal air (1,2) θ si, nε temperature of the internal wall surface (1,2,4,6,7,8,9) θ se, nε temperature of the external wall surface (1,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) Let us note that the numbers of factors can be arbitrary. In the provided example the first 11 factors were used to ensure better clarity of notation.…”
Section: Analysis Of Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basing on the quoted works as well as on other works [6][7][8][9], we know that the thermal properties of a building have direct impact on the annual consumption of energy. We also know that the thermal conductivity of a wall depends on the thermal conductivity of each layer of that wall, and therefore, the thermal resistance of the whole wall can be modeled in the way analogous to the resistance of resistors in electrical Jerzy Skrzypczyk died before publication of this work was completed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%