2012
DOI: 10.14358/pers.78.7.729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Detection in Complex Scenes Thorough Effective Separation of Buildings from Trees

Abstract: Effective separation of buildings from trees is a major challenge in image-based automatic building detection. This paper presents a three-step method for effective separation of buildings from trees using aerial imagery and lidar data. First, it uses cues such as height to remove objects of low height such as bushes, and width to exclude trees with small horizontal coverage. The height threshold is also used to generate a ground mask where buildings are found to be more separable than in so-called normalized … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of using image texture features for remote sensing data classification has been justified by several studies [39][40][41]. Similar to [42], the following image texture features are calculated in this work:…”
Section: Image Texture Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of using image texture features for remote sensing data classification has been justified by several studies [39][40][41]. Similar to [42], the following image texture features are calculated in this work:…”
Section: Image Texture Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4b shows different classes of the extracted image lines. In terms of completeness and correctness (Awrangjeb et al, 2012) the classification performance was, 'ground': 89% and 93%, 'tree': 96% and 98%, 'roof edge': 87% and 71% and 'roof ridge': 95% and 95%. Although 'tree' and 'roof ridge' classes were identified with high accuracy, there were reasons why 'ground' and 'roof edge' classes were not always so accurate.…”
Section: Line Classificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The second group consists of the non-ground points that represent elevated objects, such as buildings and trees with heights above T h . Many authors (e.g., [37,38]) have used h c = 2.5 m. However, for the Vaihingen data set, it was observed that this height threshold removes many low buildings and sheds. Therefore, h c has been set at 1 m for this study.…”
Section: Lidar Classification and Mask Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%