2014
DOI: 10.3390/rs6053716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Segmentation of Raw LIDAR Data for Extraction of Building Roofs

Abstract: Automatic extraction of building roofs from remote sensing data is important for many applications, including 3D city modeling. This paper proposes a new method for automatic segmentation of raw LIDAR (light detection and ranging) data. Using the ground height from a DEM (digital elevation model), the raw LIDAR points are separated into two groups. The first group contains the ground points that form a "building mask". The second group contains non-ground points that are clustered using the building mask. A cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
129
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the D s ij between Vi and Vj in this 4 dimensional feature space is calculated using the histogram intersection kernel (Papon et al, 2013). For the connectivity, it corresponds to the smoothness (Awrangjeb and Fraser, 2014) and convexity criterion (Stein et al, 2014) formed by the points surfaces of adjacent voxels. In Fig.…”
Section: Geometric Cues Using Perceptual Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the D s ij between Vi and Vj in this 4 dimensional feature space is calculated using the histogram intersection kernel (Papon et al, 2013). For the connectivity, it corresponds to the smoothness (Awrangjeb and Fraser, 2014) and convexity criterion (Stein et al, 2014) formed by the points surfaces of adjacent voxels. In Fig.…”
Section: Geometric Cues Using Perceptual Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative evaluation is conducted by comparing the segments against the manually segmented ground truth (see Fig. 6) using the approach described in Awrangjeb and Fraser (2014) and Vo et al (2015). Three standard metrics, P recision, Recall, and F1 -score, which are calculated via the true positive (TP), the true negative (TN), the false negative (FN), and false positive (FP), are introduced to assess the quality of segmentation.…”
Section: Experimental Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A height threshold is computed for each LiDAR point as Ht = Hg + H rf , where Hg is ground height and H rf is a relief factor that separates low objects from higher objects. For our study, we choose 1m relief factor in order to keep low height objects (Awrangjeb and Fraser, 2014b).…”
Section: Data Preprocessing and Line Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17]; evaluation of different sets of characteristics calculated from a point and its neighborhood [18][19][20]; or multiclass classification techniques based on supervised machine learning algorithms [21][22][23]. In this way, it is possible to locate different elements regardless the complexity of the scenario going from simple geometries such as roofs [24] or columns [25] to complex geometries such as trees [26,27], buildings [24,28,29] or vehicles [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%