2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25043-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Cloud Applications for Challenged Networks

Abstract: Abstract. Cloud computing has seen vast advancements and uptake in many parts of the world. However, many of the design patterns and deployment models are not very suitable for locations with challenged networks such as countries with no nearby datacenters. This talk describes the problem and discusses the options available for such locations, focusing specifically on community clouds as a short-term solution. The paper highlights the impact of recent trends in the development of cloud applications and how cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, extending the work to consider the management of cross-cloud environments including consideration of policies such as cloud-bursting in hybrid cloud infrastructures [8]. Cloud brokerage is the key application area here, but it still is in its infancy especially in terms of practical experience [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, extending the work to consider the management of cross-cloud environments including consideration of policies such as cloud-bursting in hybrid cloud infrastructures [8]. Cloud brokerage is the key application area here, but it still is in its infancy especially in terms of practical experience [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, multi-tenancy is a very uncharted land (see Table 2). As edge devices access the network via different ISPs and potentially operate across various administrative domains [51], the ability to deal with multi-organisation/multi-tenant environments becomes a must for any orchestration technology.…”
Section: Edge and Fog Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the relative additional disk write latency in rPi systems is caused by the relatively slow write speeds on flash memory used in SD cards [12]. Software deployments that predominantly use disk reads and memory access, avoiding disk writes, may therefore be even more valuable for efficiency on these devices than on cloud-based servers -otherwise the network latency gains reported 7 For this we needed to switch to the Barbossa release, version 0.8.0. in §I may be eclipsed by slower disk access. Of the applications tested in §II, the httpd, Ruby and ZooKeeper types are therefore most likely to be suited to the rPi environment.…”
Section: I/o Overheadmentioning
confidence: 99%