2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40860-018-0054-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building accountability into the Internet of Things: the IoT Databox model

Abstract: This paper outlines the IoT Databox model as a means of making the Internet of Things (IoT) accountable to individuals. Accountability is a key to building consumer trust and is mandated by the European Union's general data protection regulation (GDPR). We focus here on the 'external' data subject accountability requirement specified by GDPR and how meeting this requirement turns on surfacing the invisible actions and interactions of connected devices and the social arrangements in which they are embedded. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In radically minimising data distribution the Databox provides a means of addressing many of the adoption challenges confronting adaptive, physically immersive, data-driven experiences: apps cannot be installed in the box without a 'manifest', which describe to the user what an app does, the data it processes and for what purposes, and apps of course have their own interfaces that can enable inspection of data processing and end-user customisation and control (see Crabtree et al 2018 for further detail). The Databox puts the end-user or media consumer in the driving seat, preserving their autonomy and providing concrete assurance that their privacy is not under threat and that data cannot be used for dystopian purposes, as it remains on-the-box.…”
Section: Responding To the Adoption Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In radically minimising data distribution the Databox provides a means of addressing many of the adoption challenges confronting adaptive, physically immersive, data-driven experiences: apps cannot be installed in the box without a 'manifest', which describe to the user what an app does, the data it processes and for what purposes, and apps of course have their own interfaces that can enable inspection of data processing and end-user customisation and control (see Crabtree et al 2018 for further detail). The Databox puts the end-user or media consumer in the driving seat, preserving their autonomy and providing concrete assurance that their privacy is not under threat and that data cannot be used for dystopian purposes, as it remains on-the-box.…”
Section: Responding To the Adoption Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide an example of file copying, replacing a general progress bar that glosses computational behaviour with data buckets and the articulation of flow strategies to elaborate the point. A number of studies [e.g., 30,48,49] have subsequently established that revealing more of what goes on under the hood of technological systems is often needed to avoid a range of problems, including trust-related issues, that could otherwise negatively impact the user's overall experience. However, when confronted with hypothetical systems operating more or less autonomously, our participants' expectations about computational accountability operate at a different level.…”
Section: Computational Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here participant agency could take on a multitude of different processes that shift power from the researcher and manufacturer to the participants, primarily in understanding the data streams they generate and in being able to control them (Kennedy, Poell and Dijck 2015). One way explored by the HCI community is to store raw data locally and to give users the ability to only share reflections or the results of algorithmic processing (Crabtree et al 2018;Skatova et al 2015). For the purposes of our method, only sharing reflections as initiated by the participant diminishes co-creativity and the ability of the researcher to identify moments of interest and engage in conversation alongside those moments.…”
Section: Data Gathering and Participant Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%